Skip to content

Jane Rawson, A wrong turn at the Office of Unmade Lists (Review)

April 21, 2015

RawsonWrongTurnTransitThe weirdest thing happened when I put down Jane Rawson’s debut novel, A wrong turn at the Office of Unmade Lists: I started imagining things! This is weird because I’m not a particularly imagin­ative or fanciful person, so it must have been this book that did it. Let me explain …

First though, I need to say that I’ve been keen to read this book for some time. It started with the cover. I tend not to focus a lot on covers but some do grab me. This one, with its chequerboard of maps, is both eye-catching and intriguing. Then there’s the title. As a librarian/archivist, I’m drawn to organisation and lists but don’t mind a little anarchy every now and then. Is that what’s going on here, I wondered? And finally, there’s its MUBA award win last year. So it came down to a case of three strikes and you’re out – or, more accurately, in – and I bought the book. Well, what a read, because …

A wrong turn at the Office of Unmade Lists is a very unusual book. It traverses two places and times: Melbourne in 2030 and a sort-of imaginary San Francisco in 1997. It is, partly at least, a cli-fi* book. 2030 Melbourne is a bleak place – it’s very hot, clean water is harder to come by and more expensive than beer, soap is a luxury, and UN peacekeepers are in town. The rich survive as they do, but poverty is common, and many people live on the streets or in humpies. Bodies are regularly found in the streets. It’s a world you expect in dystopian novels, except that despite appearances, this novel is not completely dystopian.

Indeed, the novel has been described as a “genre-buster”. It is, for example, also a time-travel story, which brings me to the plot. Our protagonist is 33-year-old Caddy, who is living rough, having lost her husband and home in a heatwave-induced fire a couple of years before the novel opens. Like many in this devastated city, she survives on odd jobs – working in a bar, doing courier work, and selling her body. She has friends – an indigenous man and wheeler-dealer Ray, and bar-owner Peira. She also likes to write, and this is where San Francisco comes in because the story she is writing is set in 1997 San Francisco. It’s about two orphans-cum-childhood friends, 17-year-old Simon and 14-year old Sarah. They spend their time following a quest started by their parents in which they have to stand at least once in every 25-foot square of the USA, in order to see the whole country. With me?

At first this story of Caddy’s is told in italics within the main story, but in Part Two the narrative shifts and whole chapters are told in Sarah’s voice. Meanwhile, Caddy, with Ray who has bought some used and apparently magical maps, time-travels from Melbourne to San Francisco where they meet her creations.  Still with me? Hope so, because it gets tricksier. This “travel” involves passing through a sort of netherworld called The GAP, where we find the Office of Unmade Lists, and other sections including Tupperware Lids, Partially Used Pens, and Suspended Imaginums. Suspended Ims, as we in the know call it, is where the things that people imagine but “don’t come true” end up. I think that’s where my brief imaginings have gone!

This sounds more complex than it is – or, should I say, it’s conceptually complex but not hard to follow. Indeed it’s a hoot to read, because for all the grim, grittiness of this climate-damaged world, there’s warmth, love and humour – and a delightful sense of the absurd. I loved Rawson’s exploration of the two universes, the “real” and the “imagined”, and the way she has them meet. She messes with our minds! It made me think of Marion Halligan’s comment about her main character in Fog garden. Halligan writes: ‘She isn’t me. She’s a character in fiction. And like all such characters she makes her way through the real world which her author invents for her. She tells the truth as she sees it, but may not always be right.’ Halligan’s purpose is different, but the concerns, those to do with where imagination ends and reality begins, are similar.

That said, I’m not 100% sure of what Rawson’s purpose is, but I think she’s playing with her readers, with the idea of writing fiction, and with the meaning of fiction itself. Take, for example, her character Simon responding to Caddy telling him he’s her creation:

‘You come in here and tell us we’re imaginary, and now you’re saying you’re not even a very good writer! What do you mean? Like we’re all two-dimensional and shit, not fleshed out at all? Unrealistic? Is that what you’re saying? I don’t feel unrealistic. I feel pretty pissed off actually, which is kind of a realistic response to someone telling you you’re a shithouse imaginary character.’

Caddy looked at Ray like he might somehow get her out of this. He still had his head in his hands.

‘Sorry’, she said. ‘You’re heaps more complicated than what I imagined, if that helps.’

I love the sly, tongue-in-cheek allusion here to literary theory, to EM Forster’s notion of flat and round characters. This is just one of several references in the book to the things readers and critics talk about.

A wrong turn at the Office of Unmade Lists is a fun, absurd, clever book in which Rawson somehow marries her very real concerns about the future of our earth with a belief that human compassion and ingenuity will survive, and wraps it up in an exploration of the complex relationship of imagination to reality. Imagination, Rawson seems to be saying, is the real stuff of life.

So, my recommendation is: Don’t worry about the book making complete sense. Suspend your disbelief, enjoy the ride, and realise that here is a lively intelligence you don’t want to miss.

Lisa at ANZLitLovers also enjoyed the book.


Jane Rawson
A wrong turn at the Office of Unmade Lists
Melbourne: Transit Lounge, 2013
ISBN: 9781921924439

* Jane Rawson was, and maybe still is, Editor of Energy & Environment at The Conversation

36 Comments leave one →
  1. April 21, 2015 22:40

    Thanks for the link:)
    I loved that character Caddie….

    • April 21, 2015 22:44

      A pleasure, of course, Lisa. And yes, she was a great character wasn’t she? Warm, but pragmatic about what she had to do to survive. Loved that she quite accepted that she had to buy back her own sunglass that had been stolen from her, recognising that it was all a matter of survival.

      • April 22, 2015 05:44

        It was that brave resignation to events big and small that broke my heart about her…

  2. Glenda permalink
    April 21, 2015 23:03

    Was going to read Elizabeth is Missing Next but now it’s this one!

    • April 21, 2015 23:15

      Oh great Glenda … come back and tell me what you think. I hope you like it. It’s very different but is one of those reads that has you thinking all the time. I love reading books like that.

  3. April 22, 2015 00:49

    Sounds really intriguing. Plus, I just love the title 🙂

    • April 22, 2015 08:29

      It’s a wonderful title isn’t it Cathy. There’s a gorgeous discussion in the book of lists not yet made by the office!

  4. April 22, 2015 11:59

    I hope I won’t have a chilling effect by popping in here and saying thank you so much for the very, very kind review. You made me very happy. And yes, while the book is about a lot of things, this is pretty much the nub of it: “Imagination, Rawson seems to be saying, is the real stuff of life.”

    • April 22, 2015 17:03

      How could the author have a chilling effect? Glad you popped by Jane. It’s always a little nerve-wracking making statements about what one thinks a book is about, so am glad you’re happy with what I got out of it. I really did enjoy the read. Serious stuff, but that mind behind it, well, you made me laugh.

      • ian darling permalink
        April 22, 2015 19:10

        This sounds a fascinating book and I will look it up. I had never come across the term “Cli- fi” before!

        • April 22, 2015 19:32

          It is Ian … I wonder how easy it will be for you to find it? I must say I only started becoming aware of cli-fi last year some time. Ian McEwan’s Solar is regarded as part of the genre but whether the term was used when that came out, I’m not sure.

  5. bigphilwalks permalink
    April 22, 2015 19:01

    I have been wanting to read this…now I just have to! I hope my brain is big enough to keep up!

    • April 22, 2015 19:36

      You’ll be right bigphilwalks. Rawson hasn’t made it too hard to follow. Just trust her and don’t fight where she’s leading you.

  6. April 23, 2015 00:51

    I liked the sound of this when Lisa read it and now you have made me want to read it even more. Sadly it has not been published in the US so I have to figure out a way to get it

    • April 23, 2015 14:23

      If you have trouble let me know, Stefanie, as I know your interest in climate …

    • Glenda permalink
      April 24, 2015 22:49

      If you have a Kindle you can get a copy – that’s how I got mine. I’m going to start reading it now!

      • April 25, 2015 08:39

        Great Glenda. I’ll be interested in your response.

        Stefanie used to have a Kindle, but does still have an e-reader, though like me she’s not an enthusiastic reader of e-books. That said, my current read is a Kindle one!

  7. April 26, 2015 12:18

    I am so glad you reviewed this book. I also have noticed this cover….several time and it grabbed me. I think I could really enjoy this book. I love quirky books and suspending belief seems to happen to me a lot lately!

    • April 26, 2015 13:05

      If you like quirky books and happily suspect disbelief then this is the book for you Pam. Let me know if you do get to read it.

  8. annabelsmith permalink
    April 27, 2015 21:23

    I really need to give this book another go. So many people whose opinions on books I respect seem to have enjoyed it, I think the fact that it didn;t grab me might have just been a function of picking it up when I wasn’t in the right mood.

    • April 27, 2015 21:46

      That can happen Annabel, I think, can’t it. I have a bundle of unfinished books, that I think I could very well like at another time, so I’m not prepared to part with them. In this case, the character of Caddie got me in, I think, pretty immediately and from then on I just went with it.

  9. maamej permalink
    May 6, 2015 17:30

    Sounds like a great book, that quote totally sold me on it.

  10. NeilAtKallaroo permalink
    October 17, 2017 01:39

    Well, I finally succumbed after this appeared in one of your recent Six degrees of separation. The title had me intrigued, to say the least. Not sure I completely followed what was going on, but that didn’t matter. I enjoyed the humour bubbling through the book, and the characters are delightful, though poor Harry gets a rough trot.

    Now I’m wondering whether I have the courage to put this up as my suggestion for book club. One of the participants avows a very strong dislike of science fiction (and while you paint it as “cli fi”, I am convinced it is sci fi, or SF, as the cognisi call it [and now I am in a pickle, because I thought “cognisi” were those people in the know, as opposed to everyone else, who are the ignorant barbarians. But I can’t find a definition of the word. Help!]).

    • October 17, 2017 07:38

      Oh I’m glad you read it Neil. The humour and characters are great. Re genre, there is an element of sci-fi. Cli-fi and sci-fi aren’t mutually-exclusive. I’d call this book a genre-binder. I think you should tell your member that being in a reading group is about trying things you might not otherwise try. We have only one ” rule” in our group , and it’s “does the book have anything to talk about” the answer to this one is a resounding YES isn’t it – content, style and form, humour, characters, setting, not to mention “what’s going on”! Anyhow, I understand your dilemma. Let me know what you decide.

    • October 17, 2017 07:41

      BTW, I can’t fnd the word either. But yes, I thought it meant (means) people in the know. I’ll try to cemmber to check my Shorter Oxford later, or have you checked it too?

      • NeilAtKallaroo permalink
        October 17, 2017 13:36

        I think I was after “cognisant”, though I’ve tried to use it as a noun. Such is life.

        • October 17, 2017 14:16

          But, there should be a noun for people who are cognisant, don’t you think?


  1. The only presents I give are books | theaustralianlegend
  2. April Speculative Fiction Round-up | New Australian Women Writers Challenge Blog
  3. A Wrong Turn at the Office of Unmade Lists, Jane Rawson | theaustralianlegend
  4. A Wrong Turn at the Office of Unmade Lists | Science Book a Day
  6. 2015 Speculative Fiction Wrap-up – Australian Women Writers Challenge Blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: