Broadly speaking, Melissa Lucashenko’s latest novel, Edenglassie, does for southeast Queensland what Kim Scott’s That deadman dance does for Noongar country in southwest Western Australia. Both tell of the early days of their respective colonies from a First Nations perspective; both are written in a generous spirit but with absolute clarity about the dispossession that took place; and both suggest things could have been different.
Unlike That deadman dance, however, Edenglassie, is a dual narrative story. The main storyline, featuring two young people, Mulanyin and Nita, is set around the Magandjin or Meanjin (Brisbane) region during the mid-1850s, making it just a little later than Scott’s first contact narrative. Dispossession, massacres and other brutalities from the colonisers were met with armed resistance, but there were also attempts to work together. Paralleling this historical story is a modern one, featuring Granny Eddie, Winona, and Dr Johnny, set in the same area at the time of its 2024 bicentenary. These stories, one using historical realism and the other modern humour, riff off each other to provide a complex picture of the colonial project – then and now.
Melissa Lucashenko said much that interested me in the conversation I attended for this book, but here I’ll focus on two points she made. One is that the book’s central question is “what was going through these people’s [the colonisers’] minds?” Things could have been different then, she said, and could still be now. The other point is that she wanted to counteract the trope of the dying race. This idea has been slowly changing since Mabo, she said, but is still evident. The modern storyline, with its confident and politically involved Goorie characters, ensures that we see a vibrant, living culture in action.
Realising these two ideas is a big ask, and in my reading group there were some equivocations, but I think Lucashenko pulls it off, through creating engaging characters who come alive on the page and narratives that ring true to their times. Mulanyin, the kippa (young initiated man) from the historical period, and Winona, the fiery young woman in modern times, represent the passion of youth. They are impatient and want things to happen – or change – now. Both, however, also have elders guiding them – in the Goorie way, which is to encourage people to work it out for themselves and to remedy their mistakes.
“needing to endure the unendurable” (Mulanyin)
So, what is it that these young characters must contend with? The novel starts with two pointed events. In the modern storyline, Granny Eddie trips over a jutting tree root and is ignored by passersby until two young brown faces – Malaysian students as it turns out – help her up and get her to hospital. The modern scene is set, and all is not well.
We then flash back to 1840 where members of the Goorie Federation are looking forward to the imminent departure of the dagai, only to be told that this is now unlikely. A Goorie mother wonders what
If life never returned to normal. If the rule of law was never restored. What would her son see as a man? … Would her daughters be subject to the terrors the dagai brought?
What indeed?
Having asked the question, Lucashenko then moves her historical story to 1854-1855. Mulanyin is living with his law-brother Murree north of his own saltwater Nerang/Yugambeh home. Here, he is in close contact with the colonisers, and particularly with the Petries. At this time, the Petries, particularly the young Tom Petrie, were sympathetic to, and tried in their own way to work with, the Goories on whose land they resided. Lucashenko seems to be saying that, given colonisation was happening and wasn’t going to be undone, there were ways in which it might have been made to work (or, at least, work better). Conversations between Tom, Mulanyin, and other characters, explore their differences, particularly regarding attitudes to country. Mulanyin wants to know
what goes on in the brain of an Englishman? When he arrives in another man’s country to steal his land, and water, and game, and then with a straight face, calls those he steals from thieves? Is this how it is in Scotland? Is this why your people have fled that terrible place?’
The ensuing discussion has Tom struggling to explain the English, but admitting that “in their ignorance, they don’t understand that the land here has its own Law. They think that only their British law exists”. However, he says, they “respect some boundaries still … Those that are well defended”.
What did ‘well defended’ look like, Mulanyin wondered, if not like a thousand Goories assembled at the Woolloongabba pullen pullen? If not like Dundalli, leading the warriors who had willingly assembled under him, from Dugulumba to K’gari?
Fair point, Mulanyin.
Meanwhile, the modern-day characters are living with the fall-out from the failure of the colonisers to make it work and of the colonised to succeed in their resistance. Goories are still here, yes, but life is a struggle, and Winona wants to fight back, wants “to bite em hard onetime, while we got the chance”. She can’t understand why Granny Eddie, who grew up “with a dirt floor and empty belly” doesn’t think she deserves more. Granny, though, is two things. A pragmatist who sees that “Dagai not going away! We gotta get on with them”. And she’s an elder well-versed in her culture, so when Winona takes a hardline with Dr Johnny, who claims Aboriginal heritage, Granny says
“You’re thinking like a whitefella when ya close him out. That’s not our way. We bring people in, we bring our Mob home, and we care about them. We teach them how to behave proper way…”
Further, she argues,
“We can’t be sunk in bitterness … Or stuck in the past. We need to focus on the good dagais, like Cathy and Zainab, and them Petries, and –.”
Winona, Granny Eddie and Mulanyin all make sense, but they speak from different angles. What makes Edenglassie so interesting is the way Lucashenko gives space and respect to these angles. She certainly shows what was lost – and the utter unfairness of it. But, with the generosity of spirit we keep seeing, she also shares through her characters what living with deep connection to country means. And, she encourages everyone to think about alternative ways we can do this.
Towards the end of the novel, Gaja (Aunty) Iris shares an important story with our modern protagonists, introducing it with
we all know how important our stories are … People all over the world keep their stories close. Middle Eastern people believe … that by telling a story you can change the world, and nothing is as powerful as the right story at the right time.
With ideas about truth-telling and decolonisation becoming part of modern Australian culture, now feels like the right time for stories like Edenglassie. It might be an uncomfortable time to be a settler Australian, but that’s nothing compared with what First Nations people have endured and continue to endure. The least we can do is try to understand. Books like Lucashenko’s not only help us along this path but give us a lively read at the same time.
Melissa Lucashenko
Edenglassie
St Lucia: UQP, 2023
306pp.
ISBN: 9780702266126

A fair bit more quoting from the text than usual, ST: can’t help wondering if this doesn’t mean that you found it more complex to review …?
Partly that MR but not totally. I did take many hours over this one. The book covers so much and somehow it felt silly paraphrasing or summarising the ideas. It’s interesting writing reviews because sometimes you head down a path – established in the opening paragraph – and then find it’s hard to include other equally interesting paths for discussion. You are an astute reader of my reviews!
I irritate myself for commenting so often in an off-topic way. But you should understand that it’s because I am a truly TERRIBLE book reviewer, and mostly incapable of commenting ON-topic ! 😦
I’m interested in whatever you have to say – I love that you think it’s worth saying anything. Also, from what you say, even when not exactly on topic, it feels that you have actually read what I’ve written. It means a lot.
great review, thanks for sharing your thoughts. I loved this book and admire Lukashenko’s ability to realistically convey the wide swathe of both historic and contemporary First Nations people’s experiences and attitudes.
Thanks Denise. I admired that too … it’s important to see that as in any culture or group of people there’s discussion and dissension. Westerners often seem to think people in other cultures should be uniform while we can be individuals.
Hi Madame Gums
I note that we can comment now by replying to your email. Hooray!
Loved Edenglassie and think Lucashenko certainly deserved the Miles Franklin for this one. Can’t remember, what she even shortlisted for it this year?
Thanks for the great review.
Sara
>
Woo hoo Sara … that’s great. And no, she was long listed but not shortlisted. A shame because there’s a lot of complexity in what looks like a straightforward read isn’t there? She packs a lot of ideas and issues in.
hi Sue
‘both are written in a generous spirit but with absolute clarity about the dispossession that took place; and both suggest things could have been different.’
I very much agree with your response, and I love the way you drew out the link with the young rebellious Mulanyin and Winona: and the importance of the elders in their life to bring them to account.
having some small insight into how aboriginal law plays out by teaching respect and self control was so inspiring in this book.
I recommended this to some of the folk I have caught up with in Brisbane, so will send a link to your blog!
kate
Thanks very much Kate. I spent much longer on this post than most, because I think Lucashenko has written a book which is so enjoyable but which picks out a lot of issues without shoving them in your face. It was a challenge to narrow the post to what was its essence to me. The way she shows First Nations culture in action – particular the teaching from the elders – was just wonderful wasn’t it. I’m really glad what I’ve written resonated with you.
I agree it is so important to try and understand what other cultures have gone through and to learn. Lukashenko does a great job of explaining the Indigenous people’s story.
Thanks Pam … yes, I think she does. She doesn’t pull punches, but she also tells a story that will hopefully get more people reading outside their own culture.
Jonathan and I both read this book at the end of last year. I was personally disappointed to not see this book on more shortlists.
I like how you linked this to Kim Scott’s book (I really must read it) and the talk you went to with Lucashenko. It was hard to narrow down which themes in this book to focus on in a review, so that was a useful way of doing it.
What did your book group discussion focus on?
Oh, Brona, you were both early readers! Yes I’d have liked to see it on more shortlists too. I think it’s more complex than it looks on the surface. I took a long time with this post trying to work out what to hone in on because I found it so interesting to read and loved thinking about all the things she was saying.
My reading group’s discussion was a bit scattered. Most liked it, but I think there was more real discussion about the modern characters than the historical, though we all like how she portrayed colonial society.
Some didn’t really like the dual storyline – I think because the older storyline was more demanding to read – but we all liked her use of humour. We also talked about her use of language. The overall feeling was appreciation for how she gave life and humanity to the facts we know.
I’m doing some catching up. I didn’t think much of Too Much Lip. This sounds like both a better and a more important work, so I really should read it.
I thought about you as I was reading this Bill. I’d love to know what you thought should you read it.
I appreciate what you said about the author wanting to show that her people are not simply dying out, which suggests rolling over, giving up, etc. One thing I liked about Too Much Lip was how much fight that book had, so now that I’m thinking about it, perhaps the author’s message in that novel was also that the indigenous people are never going to just lie down and die because they’ve been assaulted for so long.
Thanks for putting in extra time on this review, Sue. It paid off wonderfully. I love the comparison with That Deadman Dance. My book clubs, both of them, had a majority of people who found the modern story unsatisfactory. I’m with you, and your account of it is terrific
Oh thanks Jonathan. I’m really pleased you agree. What dissension we had in our group was either about the modern story or about the fact that there were the two stories. Like you, obviously, I thought both stories were good and relevant.
This sounds like another impressive work by this author, a woman I’d perhaps not have so prominent in my mind without the attention paid to her here (and on other notable sites) over the years.
No, well you wouldn’t would you, because I suspect her novels are not well marketed overseas. I’d love to know how they’d be received though by people not immersed in the issues as we are. I think they d still work because her characters are lively even if some of the political nuances might be missed.
Pingback: Spell the Month in Books – September | Me fail? I fly!