Regular readers here will know a few things about me. One is that I don’t regularly read crime, and another is that for three years, before the pandemic struck, I was the litblogging mentor for an ACT Writers Centre program. One of the last two participants in that program was Shelley Burr, author of the just-published crime novel Wake.
In my post on that 2019 program, I introduced Shelley as follows:
Shelley Burr is working on a novel, and took part in the ACT Writers Centre’s well-regarded Hard Copy program last year … She is particularly interested in what she calls “drought noir”, which term sounds perfect for some of the crime coming out of Australia at present. Shelley has had her writing place well in the Stockholm Writers Festival First Pages program.
That novel she was writing was Wake. It won the CWA Debut Dagger in 2019. It was also shortlisted for the 2019 Kill Your Darlings Unpublished Manuscript Award, which gave her a Varuna fellowship, and the 2020 Bath Novel Awards, which is an international award for emerging writers. Judge for the Bath award, literary agent Jenny Savill, wrote of Wake:
With forensic attention to detail, the reader is effortlessly drawn into the small town, rural Australian setting and a community in mourning. Immersive and riveting.
Savill was right on all fronts. Burr’s attention to detail is forensic, and readers (even non-crime readers like me) are “effortlessly drawn in”. I was thoroughly engaged from the opening pages, and this is because, besides being a crime novel, it’s a novel about character, and what happens to people when terrible things happen to them. How do people respond, and why do different people respond differently? It confronts readers to think about our own responses. How would we respond if it happened to us? And, how would, or do, we respond when it happens to others?
Wake is about a cold-case that took place on a remote farm some twenty years before the novel opens. Nine-year-old Evelyn (Evie) McCreery disappeared from her bed one night, never to be seen again. This means the novel alludes to a longstanding Australian writing tradition, that concerning the lost child. However, this motif has layers of cultural complexity that are not central to this novel, so I’m just mentioning it and moving on.
Now, the plot … as the book’s promotion says, “no forced entry, no fingerprints, no footprints, no tyre tracks”. Evie’s twin sister, Mina, has grown up in the wake (pun intended!) of that disappearance. She has never fully recovered and is quietly trying to solve the mystery on her own. The novel opens with the clearly fragile Mina doing her shopping under the kindly eye of a local shopkeeper. A stranger, who turns out to be private investigator Lane Holland, approaches her, but she is not interested. The novel progresses from this point with the twists and turns typical of the genre until its inevitable – though not completely expected – resolution.
Wake is carefully plotted, with, for example, hints concerning Lane Holland and why he has chased this particular case being gradually shared. Wake is also well-paced, starting slowly, and gradually building intrigue until near the end when the pace hots up. Suddenly, the chapters become shorter, causing the alternating perspectives, which characterise the narrative, to become more urgent.
As I mentioned above, the characters are a major strength of the novel. Mina and Lane are sensitively developed. Both are driven by past trauma, and can be tough and prickly, but both also exhibit moments of vulnerability and tenderness which help us care about them. There are a few other characters, the main ones being Mina’s more together friend Alanna whose sister had also disappeared around the same time as Mina’s, and Lane’s much younger sister Lynnie. Though minor, they too have flesh.
The narrative is chronological, with occasional flashbacks filling in some gaps. Other gaps are cleverly filled in by entries on a social media forum, MyMurder, which open some of the chapters. They add a thoughtful layer to the story, by conveying how such mysterious cases catch the public attention and how obsession with them can play out. They show how crime aficionados, conspiracy theorists, and others, can spear wildly away from the truth and potentially, if not actually, cause mental harm to those most touched by the crime.
So, yes, I was impressed. The writing and plotting is so sure, and Burr’s exploration of the crime is considered, sympathetic, and grounded in reality. There is drama – of course – but it properly serves the story and the complexity of the emotions, reactions and consequences that Burr is exploring. This made for engrossing reading for a non-crime reader like me, but Wake is also, if the awards tell us anything, great crime reading. It’s a page turner, with depth.
Now, I’d better at least mention the setting, given I’ve referenced Burr’s interest in “drought noir”. Wake is set in rural central New South Wales. Burr, herself, grew up in regional New South Wales, and her grandparents had a farm in regional Victoria, so her writing of place and country life felt authentic. The setting adds tension because Mina and her father Liam’s property is remote, remote enough that they have installed alarms on the gates to announce the arrival of visitors. You can’t be too careful when you live so far away from help.
However, the property also neatly reflect the challenges being faced by Australian farmers in climate-change-affected times. It was a working farm, but the disappearance of Evie consumed the family’s energy so much that viable farming fell by the wayside. In a nice political touch that speaks to our times, Burr has Mina and her father moving into working it as a conservation project.
Wake earned Shelley a two-book deal with Hachette, and is about to be published in the USA. Having now read it, I’m not surprised. I recommend it.
Hachette Australia: Gadigal Country/Sydney, 2022
(Uncorrected proof courtesy Hachette Australia)
13 thoughts on “Shelley Burr, Wake (#BookReview)”
Crime on a drought stricken farm sounds very Jane Harper – I just hope that Burr handles the farming and location elements much better than Harper did. (I’m sure she does!). I’ll get my bookseller to order me a copy.
I haven’t read Harper, but while this feeds into the wider genre, it felt quite different to The dry from my experience of the movie. A bit less archetypal I feel, more real? Anyhow, see what you think.
Ripper of a review of what is obviously a ripper of a novel !
I can only hope that someone is bright enough to hand it to a reader who’ll do justice to it.
One for you to look out for I’d say M-R.
Ear to th ground: shoulder to to wheel: eye on the sky, ST ..
Pleased to hear it M-R!
Gosh, this does sound good – and I say that as another non-crime-reader!
Oh good, Liz, that makes me happy to think I’ve made it attractive to people like me!
I read The Dry and agree that,readable enough, is a bit bleh! I have read too much crime fiction which is almost too successful for its own good. I did enjoy Val Mcdermid(very much the Scottish queen of crime) 1979 which reads as a vivid picture of tabloid journalism in that era and I enjoyed very much.
Thanks Ian. Not being a crime reader I haven’t read The dry, but your reaction is that of a few people I know, though of course it was a big best-seller too. I know of Val McDiarmid of course but haven’t yet read her though I do have her “version” of Northanger Abbey. Maybe I should look out for 1979. Tabloid journalism sounds up my interest alley.
I’m glad you added that this is now in the U.S. — that prompted me to check my local library for a copy. It looks like we don’t have it yet, but I could request a copy.
I think it’s coming to the USA very soon Melanie, but maybe not quite yet. The author had her proof copy on social media a couple of weeks ago.
Pingback: 2023 ABIA Book Awards shortlists | ANZ LitLovers LitBlog