Skip to content

Jane Austen, Love and freindship (Review)

July 22, 2012
Love and Freindship editions

Love and Freindship editions

If you are a Jane Austen fan, you don’t just read her six novels. You read her letters, her unfinished works and her juvenilia. And you read them more than once. So it is that I have just – for my local Jane Austen group – reread Love and freindship (sic), the short epistolary novel she wrote in her 15th year. It is a fun – and illuminating – read. It’s the illuminating part that I plan to focus on here.

But first, a little about the plot. It commences with a letter in which Isabella asks her friend Laura to tell her daughter “the Misfortunes and Adventures” of her Life. “You are this day 55”, she says, and surely now safe “from the determined Perseverance of disagreeable Lovers and the cruel Persecutions of obstinate Fathers”. Laura, while rejecting that she is too old for such “unmerited” misfortunes, agrees to tell her story  to Isabella’s daughter Marianne as a “useful lesson”. What follows is a melodramatic story of sudden friendships, quick-not-always legal marriages, and wild coincidences, accompanied by much fainting and “running mad”.

This doesn’t sound much like the writer described by Charlotte Bronte as “sensible and suitable” does it? And, in fact, this wildly improbable, effusive story isn’t much like her. Or is it? This is the point I’d like to explore a little in my post, because there are many seeds here of the writer Austen was becoming – of the things that were to concern her and of the style she was developing.

The thing that concerned her most was to make fun of silly or ridiculous people and ideas. The most obvious of these in Love and freindship was the late eighteenth century’s cult of sensibility, which involved the favouring of sensibility over sense, the fostering of an overactive imagination (as evidenced by the popularity of Gothic novels). But what is exaggerated and parodied in Love and freindship become more considered subjects in her first novels, Northanger Abbey and Sense and sensibility.

There are, for example, obvious similarities between Laura, here, Catherine Morland in Northanger Abbey and Marianne in Sense and sensibility, but Laura’s complete refusal to recognise that sense has any place in her life is modified in Catherine and Marianne who learn through experience that their imagination and sensibilities, if left uncurbed, can get them into trouble. (Intriguingly the recipient of Laura’s letters is a Marianne. A little Austen in-joke perhaps?). Pride and Prejudice’s Lydia could perhaps be seen as Laura’s true heir: Lydia is not described in quite the same terms as Laura, but she certainly pays no credence to anything remotely sensible.

Now I’m going to be lazy and simply illustrate Austen’s changed approach with some comparative examples. Here is Laura on an older man, her husband’s father:

for what could be expected from a Man who possessed not the smallest atom of Sensibility, who scarcely knew the meaning of Simpathy, and who actually snored.

And here is Marianne, in love with the dashing Willoughby, on Colonel Brandon:

He was silent and grave. His appearance, however, was not unpleasing, in spite of his being in the opinion of Marianne and Margaret an absolute old bachelor, for he was on the wrong side of five-and-thirty; but though his face was not handsome his countenance was sensible, and his address was particularly gentlemanlike.

While Laura ends her tale with:

I took up my Residence in a romantic Village in the Highlands of Scotland where I have ever since continued, and where I can, uninterrupted by unmeaning Visits, indulge in a melancholy solitude my unceasing Lamentations for the Death of my Father, my Mother, my Husband, and my Freind.

Catherine learns her lesson and

… was completely awakened. Henry’s address, short as it had been, had more thoroughly opened her eyes to the extravagance of her late fancies than all their several disappointments had done. Most grievously was she humbled. … The absurdity of her curiosity and her fears — could they ever be forgotten? She hated herself more than she could express.

Exaggeration and parody are the tools used in Love and friendship, while the adult Austen used the more sophisticated, though no less funny, tools of wit and irony to achieve her satire.  And again, I’ll demonstrate with comparative examples. In Love and freindship she satirises novel-reading with broad humour:

“Where, Edward in the name of wonder (said he) did you pick up this unmeaning gibberish? You have been studying Novels I suspect.”

But in Northanger Abbey, the plot itself demonstrates the foolishness of reading novels unwisely, while a respected character conveys Jane’s truth:

The person, be it gentleman or lady, who has not pleasure in a good novel, must be intolerably stupid.

Love and friendship is unsubtle, and is clearly the work of a youthful writer, but it is a hoot to read and we are lucky to have it (and her other juvenilia) to show us an author in the making.

Note: Love and friendship (1790) is available in many formats and manifestations. My first copy was in RW Chapman’s edition of her Minor works, but this time I read it on my Kindle using a bought version, the Oxford World Classics edition titled Catharine and Other Writings. However, you can read (or obtain) it online at Project Gutenberg.

12 Comments leave one →
  1. July 22, 2012 16:59

    Very interesting, Sue. I think the connections you’ve highlighted are indelible. The hallmarks of the writer we all know are definitely there. John

    • July 22, 2012 17:26

      Oh thank you John … there so many of them I could have gone on and on and on … it is such fun to see the writer in the making.

  2. July 22, 2012 20:11

    *gasp* Snoring! That’s the worst! 😛

    I shudder to think of anyone ever reading the stories I wrote in my tween years!

    • July 22, 2012 20:45

      You never know … You wrote some good stuff. I wonder what she thought about people reading her youthful work?

  3. July 22, 2012 22:58

    There is great stuff in the juvenilia–not just Love and freindship, but also an her history of England.

    • July 23, 2012 00:20

      Oh yes, thst’s a great one too, George. I’d love her juvenilia … It’s so exuberant isn’t it!

  4. July 23, 2012 12:23

    You make a good case for reading Jane Austen’s books. One day I will give another one of them a try – so far I’ve only read Emma but wasn’t very keen on it. Maybe you can help with a suggestion. 🙂

    • July 23, 2012 15:07

      Ah Delia, glad to have revived a potential interest … Emma was my least favourite for the longest time so perha[s it’s not the best one to start with. P&P is of course the most popular but two others you might like are Persuasion and Sense and sensibility. Northanger Abbey is a hoot but a lot of people don’t like it or miss what it’s about.

  5. July 26, 2012 04:07

    Your comparisons were so much! It’s a good thing Colonel Brandon didn’t snore I suppose 😉 I’ve read Austen’s unfinished work but I don’t recall ever reading her juvenilia. I will have to look through my books and see and if I haven’t I will get myself to PG for that free Kindle download 🙂

    • July 26, 2012 08:29

      The Juvenilia is great fun Stefanie … as George said, the History of England is a hoot. It, Lady Susan and this one are the best known but they are all fun to read.


  1. Movie: Love & Friendship | The Resident Judge of Port Phillip
  2. Love and Freindship, Jane Austen | theaustralianlegend

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: