This post was inspired by the Pulp Fiction exhibition* at the Canberra Museum and Art Gallery that ran from August to October this year. The exhibition used materials from two collectors, Graeme Flanagan (d. 2015) and James Doig, who also wrote the accompanying booklet. Doig says that Flanagan “amassed one of the most significant collections of Australian pulp fiction paperbacks”. He also collected original cover art, and in 1994 wrote Australian vintage paperback guide, which was apparently the first detailed book about Australian pulp fiction and is still an authority on the subject.
Most of you probably know what pulp fiction is, but if you don’t, it encompasses cheaply produced “mass market paperbacks and digests” in popular genres such as Westerns, crime, romance, adventure, science fiction and horror. Printed on “pulp” paper, they were not made to last and were poorly regarded by the literati of the time. But, of course, they were part of Australia’s reading culture and are now being recognised for the cultural objects they are. Because of their cheap production and disposability, however, they can be tricky to find – and, says, Doig, even Australia’s legal deposit libraries don’t hold complete collections.
Doig starts by referring to an article in the Tribune titled “I spent a week in a literary sewer” by journalist Rex Chiplin who wrote about the “muck” – “the pornography, sex, sadism, brutality and illiteracy” – being sold weekly on Australian newsstands. He wanted to find out where it all came from – but I wanted to find out who Rex Chiplin was. Well, I found out, via a blog called Ethical Martini, that he was a communist, which is not surprising because, as most Australians would know, the Tribune was the Communist Party of Australia’s newspaper.
Apparently Chiplin was called before Australia’s version of the USA’s McCarthy hearings, the Royal Commission on Espionage (1954-55), but the tidbit I want to share is Ethical Martini’s quoting another communist journalist, David McKnight, on Chiplin. McKnight wrote:
One unusual piece of exposure journalism was the pamphlet, “Facts Behind the Liquor Commission”, printed by the Communist Party of Australia at its underground printery which set out to expose capitalism in the shape of the ‘brewery barons’. Written by a journalist (probably Rex Chiplin) who had a racy turn of phrase (‘Bottled beer was as rare as a bankrupt Vice Squad sergeant’) the pamphlet incidentally exposed corruption in the labour movement…
It’s the “racy turn of phrase” that caught my attention, because it is certainly in evidence in the “sewer article” where he describes, for example, the directors of a magazine publishing company, American-Australasian, as “all North Shore pukka sahibs.” A little further on he describes a magazine called Action Detective Stories as “good wholesome literature for homicidal maniacs and similar unfortunates”. He criticises these “sewer” magazines’ forays into political commentary about the Korean War and Soviet behaviour in southeast Asia – but, I’m getting offtrack, so let me just share what he writes about Consolidated Press:
Consolidated Press, Frank Packer’s organisation … publishes a host of crime, sex and violence comics and the Phantom and Star paper-covered novels. Phantoms and Stars are direct reprints, lurid covers and all, of American gutter novelettes which are churned out by the score in “pulp factories.”
By reprinting they apparently circumvented import restrictions. Doig says that “Phantom Books … reprinted more than 300 of the best American crime novels between 1953 and 1961 and is a highly desirable series.”
Another company named and shamed by Chiplin was Cleveland, which our mate Doig says is the only pulp publisher still active (in Australia) today – focusing these days on westerns. Cleveland was also known for the Larry Kent I hate crime series which “was named after a 1950s Sydney radio show [preserved at the National Film and Sound Archive] about a hard-boiled New York detective”. The radio series commenced in 1950, and its popularity inspired, says The Thrilling Detective website, Cleveland “to try their hand at some Larry Kent novels”. They were written by American expat Don Haring through “an arrangement” with the radio producer. The first series of these monthly novelettes commenced in April 1954.
The Thrilling Detective explains that:
over 400 Larry Kent novels and novelettes were pumped out under the Larry Kent byline in the next thirty years, and supposedly, as late as the 1990s, the series was still being produced in Scandinavia. The covers usually featured paintings of leggy, full-figured babes and sported such snappy (and often exclamation mark-endowed) titles as Kill Me a Little!, This Way, Sucker!, Cute Heat!, Dig Me a Dame! and Stand Up and Die! Add on the 150 or so radio shows, and our Larry turns out to be one of the hardest working eyes around…
If you, like me, ever give pulp fiction a thought, it is probably for these covers, “lurid” though Chiplin thought they were. As The Thrilling Detective says:
Although the books were decidedly hokey pulp affairs, and by no means great literature, the covers themselves have a gorgeously cheesy flavour, and are now quite collectible. In fact, most of the web sites featuring Kent deal as much with the covers than the contents of the books.
Doig says that selling these books, which happened at stalls and newsagents on street corners and railway stations, was a competitive business. So “the cover was all important, the more colourful and garish the better.” He names some of the illustrators who did these covers – Stan Pitt and Walter Stackpoole (for Cleveland), and Col Cameron and cartoonist Frank Benier (for Horwitz). It is these covers as much as anything which now make these books highly sought after – and highly exhibitable!
Have you ever read any pulp fiction – or, even, are you a collector? I’d love to know.
* Images from the exhibition can be seen on Pinterest.
24 thoughts on “Monday musings on Australian literature: Pulp fiction, 1940s to 1970s”
Yes and Yes. Love those covers.
I nearly mentioned you and some of the gorgeous covers on your blog Guy. They are what I first think of when I think pulp fiction these days.
My Pop was really big on the Westerns but they really didn’t stand the test of time. Quite literally disintegrated. But he loved them.
Haha, Theresa, that’s “pulp” paper for you! I have similar memories of seeing those books around older generation people’s homes. I guess they satisfied the need that crime TV shows and the like satisfy now (to some degree anyhow)?
Pulp fiction has been with us for a while. The girls in Seven Little Australians read ‘yellowbacks’ on the train (more likely romance than crime) and most of Steele Rudd’s fiction was published by the Bookstall Company which initially anyway sold its books through railway station bookstalls.
Thanks for this Bill. My research was focused more on the middle of the 20th century, so I’m pleased to have you fill in some info from earlier times.
I think I must have had a sheltered life, I can’t remember seeing any of these anywhere!
I can understand that. I never saw them in my family home, but I feel my uncle may have read some. I could be making that up! I do vaguely recollect them at railway stalls.
Thank you for this post, WG. I have always loved those vintage covers. Pulp Fiction became a part of pop-culture a few years ago. Every millenial wanted to read it. It is available in my mother tongue too. Which is Tamil. I haven’t tried it, but I want to. The biggest book fair in my city will be held in January. I can buy a couple of books at great discounts there. I might buy a pulp fiction too.
The covers are great aren’t they Deepika. I didn’t know that about its becoming part of pop culture. I wonder if it was over here? If you buy some in January, do write a post about it – I’d like to see the covers!
Yes I have some, and yes I have read some. Now I keep them because of the covers! I don’t have the ‘lurid’ covers, but criminal covers and science fiction covers. I love the artwork.
That’s wonderful Meg … I love that you too collect (or keep) them for the covers. I notice that some of Jon Cleary’s books were published this was – like The sundowners.
Those covers have a strange power about them. Pulp publishing at least gave writers an outlet with a writer like Michael Moorcock achieving a enviable fluency with material that was highly literate.
Yes, you Ian and Meg above, remind me just how much SF pulp fiction I consumed in my twenties and how important it was to SF writers after the War for whom it was an important source of income.
Thanks Bill. I think I didn’t read this fiction because I was never really into any of the genres. I have always tended to like more general fiction – what do we call non-genre fiction?!
Yes, that’s a good description Ian, “strange power”, because you know exactly what they are doing but you are attracted anyhow. And good point about giving writers an outlet. I don’t know Michael Moorcock but I did see at least Aussie name of interest, Jon Cleary. He may not be quite as literary as Moorcock but he had a respectable career as a writer of popular fiction as well as television and movies.
Have heard Jon Cleary’s name because he is well known over here….his pulp background makes me want to give him a go!
Haha, Ian, whatever it takes to get your interest! Seriously though, I’m fascinated that he is well known your way.
Interesting post. I’m pretty fond of pulp (and the covers). I love HP Lovecraft, I’ve enjoyed Zane Grey, I think Edgar Rice Burroughs is underappreciated in terms of sheer skill at structuring a book, I loved Donald Westlake’s Somebody Owes Me Money (there’s a review at mine). Ok, most of them were awful, but there’s so much energy and there are definite gems.
The pulps paid, so it’s no surprise they attracted some good writers amidst all the hackwork.
Thanks Max. Oh yes Zane Grey, I think these were certainly read by my uncle. I’ll check your review of Westlake. But, good point about the pulps paying.
What a great fun exhibition! My husband enjoys a good pulp read now and then and I have read a few but generally prefer the art on the covers to the text inside!
I think most people do, Stefanie!
I so well remember pulp fiction books always around the house when I was a child & teen, as my dad was an avid reader. Sadly, I didn’t appreciate them at the time. I would dearly love to find a stash of these in someone’s attic or yard sale. (Bev at My Reader’s Block reviews an envy-inducing parade of them.)
I had never given any thought to pulps in Australia, but I’m sort of tickled they had a similar arc (and reputation) as in Canada. In the back of my mind, I think I thought the emergence of the CanLit movement in the 1960s-70s was their death knell here. See how wrong I was!
Thanks Debbie, I’m loving hearing from people in other countries about their pulp fiction memories. I must check out Bev’s blog!