Delicious descriptions from Down Under: Albert Camus on world peace

How’s this for a bit of communication across cultures: an Australian biographer reporting a French writer commenting on the death of an American president. It comes from the book I’ll be reviewing in the next couple of days, Hazel Rowley’s Franklin and Eleanor: An extraordinary marriage. In it Rowley quotes Albert Camus on the death of Franklin Delano Roosevelt in 1945:

‘His face was the very image of happiness,’ Albert Camus wrote in the French Resistance newspaper, Combat. ‘History’s powerful men are not generally men of such good humour … There is not a single free human being who does not regret his loss and who would not have wished his destiny to have continued a little longer. World peace, that boundless good, ought to be planned by men with happy faces rather than by sad-eyed politicians.’

Somehow I didn’t expect something quite so sunny-sounding from Albert Camus, but perhaps I don’t know him as well as I thought I did. We are, I think, more cynical these days about the concept of “world peace” but we can still hope, can’t we? Does anyone know of any happy-faced world leaders out there that we can call on to promote the cause (besides the current Dalai Lama that is)?

10 thoughts on “Delicious descriptions from Down Under: Albert Camus on world peace

  1. Cannot imagine Monsieur Camus feeling this way. Love Hazel Rowley’s work and am curious about this one. You don’t think Barack Obama has a peace-inspiring smile? Trouble is, we have too much information about everything but the real and vital issues.

    • This is my first Rowley … but I would like to read more, particularly her Christina Stead and the one on Richard Wright. Oh, and I suppose I’d like the Sartre/de Beauvoir one too! Obama … yes I suppose he does really, though I haven’t seen him smiling much lately. The art of being a politician – of having to compromise one’s ideas/ideals (as Roosevelt found too) – does not sit easily on all people I think.

  2. I think one should not put too much weight on war-time editorials. Nor, for that matter, in smiles–Eisenhower had quite a smile, too, but he and Roosevelt could be as ruthless as they considered they had to be.

    • Now that wasn’t kind to burst our bubble, George! As for smiles, what’s that song? Ah yes, “Never smile at a crocodile, Don’t be taken in by his cheery grin?”. I suppose you’re right!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s