Skip to content

George G. Foster, The eating-houses (Review)

February 7, 2016

Some of you will know that Mr Gums and I love to eat out. So, when I saw a Library of America (LOA) Story of the Week titled “The eating-houses” by one George G Foster appear in my in-box at the end of last year, I knew I had to read it. I just had to find the time to slip it in. I eventually did, and here I am.

The first thing to say about it is that those of us who thought our era of conspicuous dining-out was a new thing are wrong. Foster writes in the opening paragraph of his article that:

We once undertook to count these establishments in the lower part of the City, but got surfeited on the smell of fried grease before we got half through the first street, and were obliged to go home in a cab. We believe, however, that there can’t be less than a hundred of them within half a mile radius of the Exchange. They are too important a “slice” [see publication details below to understand this reference] of New York to be overlooked …

This reminded me of my return last year to the little suburban shopping centre of my teen years – Wahroonga, in Sydney. I looked across the street, from where I was standing, to the local supermarket on the corner and ran my eyes down from it to the other corner. Just a short distance. And it was wall-to-wall cafes with nary another business in between. That was just that little side of that street. There were a couple of cafes on my side, and around both corners, and across the other street as well. Amazeballs as the young would say! Clearly Mr Gums and I are not alone in our predilection for eating out.

Anyhow, back to Foster. You might have gathered from my excerpt that he was not much in favour of these establishments, and you’d be right. He satirises them, and their denizens, pretty mercilessly. He clearly thinks home-cooked meals are  better – “the fare is generally bad enough — not nearly equal to that which the cook at Home above Bleecker* saves for the beggars”. He ridicules their lack of style and taste:

It is really wonderful how men of refined tastes and pampered habits, who at home are as fastidious as luxury and a delicate appetite can make them, find it in their hearts—or stomachs either—to gorge such disgusting masses of stringy meat and tepid vegetables, and to go about their business again under the fond delusion that they have dined.

He categorises the three main styles of eating-houses – satirically referencing the great Swedish botanist and taxonomist Linnæus – and satirises the diners. He describes a journalist ordering “rosegoose”: “when goose leaps suddenly in front of a poet of the Press, who ordered it probably through a commendable preference for a brother of the quill”.

At the cheap Sweenyorum “sixpenny eating-house” style of place, you only get a spoken menu which, he says, “does away with lying in print, to which bills of fare as well as newspapers are too much addicted”. Still, beware here, he advises, of added extras, or your sixpenny cut will suddenly be “seven shillin'”! Just order “a small plate of roast beef mixed, (this means mashed turnips and potatoes in equal quantities)”, add some bread perhaps, and a glass of free water. Then you will “pay one shilling for the whole, and go about your business like a refreshed and sensible man”.

He briefly mentions the cake and coffee shops which are open all night, and therefore frequented by journalists, firemen, and the like. He reserves special praise for the latter:

They are generally far more moderate than politicians and less noisy than gentlemen. At the first tingle of the fire-bell they leap like crouching greyhounds, and are in an instant darting through the street towards their respective engine-houses—whence they emerge dragging their ponderous machines behind them, ready to work like Titans all night and all day, exposing themselves to every peril of life and limb, and performing incredible feats of daring strength, to save the property of people who know nothing about them, care nothing for them, and perhaps will scarcely take the trouble to thank them.

Oh dear – I do hope their “plate of biscuits with a lump of butter in the belly for three cents, and a cup of coffee for as much more” provided them with enough sustenance! And did you note the reference to politicians?

His final paragraph is reserved for the “expensive and aristocratic restaurant of which Delmonico’s is the only complete specimen in the United States”. I was rather intrigued by this because he argues that, at a place like this, you will get

a dinner which is not merely a quantity of food deposited in the stomach, but is in every sense and to all the senses a great work of art.

“A great work of art” is how many of our top chefs like to see their food today. Paying large sums for food like this seems, in one sense, insensitive. And yet, does art have to last forever, or can it be enjoyed in the moment before we move on? I’m still pondering this.

The interesting thing is, as LOA’s notes tell us, that Foster’s “preference for high-society haunts like Delmonico’s ultimately caused his downfall”. He was imprisoned for forging cheques, and spent 9 months in prison the year before he died. His obituary in the New York Times described him as

a remarkable example of the worthlessness of a brilliant talent unguided by a moral purpose, or a decent regard for the proprieties of civilized society.

Do consider reading this article. It’s short and entertaining – and is a fascinating piece of 19th century social history.

George G. Foster
“The eating-houses”
First published: In New York in slices, by an Experience Carver, 1849.
Available: Online at the Library of America

* A residential area of New York.

12 Comments leave one →
  1. February 8, 2016 12:23 am

    This sounds intriguing. Thank you for sharing your thoughts. 🙂

  2. February 8, 2016 12:56 am

    This arrived in my in-box while psych daughter and I were dining out at Gypsy Tapas in Freo. Good food, beer brewed on the premises, live music and narry a drop of fried oil to be smelled. I would never complain about home cooking – except maybe my own – but you’ve gotta love a night out.

  3. February 8, 2016 2:34 am

    i enjoy eating out but I don’t do it often – too much food of a kind I don’t eat at home – it’s not real good for the diet. That said, I do enjoy taking a book to a nice quiet restaurant where i find a cozy corner to spend an hour or so with a meal I didn’t prepare and no clean-up!

    ‘Reading the article, I’ll bet the smell was a bit different if the cooks on the street were using a lot of lard rather than whatever it was cook had at home. The smell of “Rosebeefrosegoorosemuttonantaters” might put a person off a bit if mixed with the smell of the pub. I don’t know if I’d actually go and eat there or not if I had a cook at home – maybe with a girlfriend for tea and a pastry. 🙂

    • February 8, 2016 7:46 am

      You know Bekah, I love taking a book to a cafe too. If ever I have a day or two on my own, ie not going out anywhere, I’ll do that just to feel part of the world. It almost never happens these days, with Mr Gums and I both retired, but it is important to me to feel part of the world.

      As for food and diet, there are a lot of restaurants here now where you can get pretty healthy food that’s not highly caloric, though I have noticed that the healthier it is, usually the more expensive it is!

      • February 8, 2016 9:23 am

        Actually, I had a Subway sandwich (turkey/bacon/avocado) just the other day and sat inside to eat (a nice little shop for Subway!) whilst enjoying some book on my iPad. Very relaxing – has to be a quiet and comfy restaurant –

        When I was in college and waitressing for spending money there was a solo woman who would come in every evening about 5:30 and take out a paperback to read with her dinner. I thought that was the height of luxury then. lol –

        • February 8, 2016 11:07 am

          Haha, Bekah. I would have too. That would have been even less common then that it is today I’d have thought.

  4. February 9, 2016 6:40 am

    Sounds like fun. I think it amusing that his gastronomic tastes got him thrown in prison. The things we do for a good meal!

    • February 9, 2016 8:15 am

      Haha, Stefanie. Though part of it too was apparently forging cheques for fancy clothes. Probably all the bette to attend Delmonicos!

      • February 9, 2016 8:50 am

        Oh yes, one must also dress the part too I suppose. And so I never eat at 5-star places, I cringe at the prices and I don’t have the proper attire. However with a cook like Bookman, I don’t think I missing out one bit!

        • February 9, 2016 10:00 am

          No, from what I hear I don’t think you are. I’m more of an extrovert so I like being out and about, watching people. I am though a low key dresser. I get away with as least dressily dressed as I can!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: