National Science Week, which inspired last week’s post, finished yesterday, but I decided to extend it a day by writing a post on Australian non-fiction on science subjects. I’ll focus of course on works created for general readers, not academic works. Unlike last week’s list, I haven’t read all the books I list here. Given the surge in general science publishing in the last decade or so, I bet you all have favourites – including of course non-Australian books. I look forward to hearing about them.
Science is a rather broad church, and I’m interpreting it broadly, so this is an eclectic list. As last week, the books are listed in order of publication
Margaret Wertheim’s Pythagoras’ trousers: God, physics and the gender wars (1995) is a book I read with my reading group, though my memory tells me I didn’t finish it! My excuse, as I recollect, is that it was a busy time. Wertheim is an Australian science writer who has lived for some time now, I believe, in the USA. In this book she argues that physics has, traditionally/historically been associated with God. Stephen Hawking and Einstein, she says, both invoke God in their writing. She develops this argument further to suggest that “the priestly culture of physics” has worked as a barrier to women entering the field. This book is now 20 years old. If she was right then, is she still now? I’m not sure about the religion aspect, but gender imbalance is still an issue in many sciences (though not, interestingly, in medicine!)
Tim Flannery’s The Weather Makers: The history and future impact of climate change (2005) is a book I should have read, particularly as I have it in my TBR pile. It won a New South Wales Premier’s Literary Prize for Critical Writing. Flannery is probably Australia’s best known and most prolific scientist-writer. Trained as a palaeontologist, he now uses his science to support his role these days as an environmentalist and climate change activist. For a list of his writing, which includes his quarterly essay on extinction that I have reviewed, check out his Wikipedia page.
Mohammed Khadra’s Making the Cut: A Surgeon’s Stories Of Life On The Edge (2009) is the memoir of a urologist. I read it just before I started blogging. Like many science-based books for a general market, this book is not so much about the science of medicine as about ethics and politics. It provides a fascinating insight into the tough life of medical students. I loved Khadra’s discussion of how he arrived at his choice of speciality. Khadra believes that surgeons must understand humankind and that one of best ways to teach this is through poetry! Every chapter in the book starts with a poem, just as his surgical tutorials, when he was Professor of Surgery, ended with poetry.
Bianca Nogrady’s The end: The human experience of death (2013) (my review) looks at death from every conceivable angle – medical, sociological, psychological, philosophical, legal and ethical. One of the most intriguing discussions – from a medical and ethical review – in the book concerns defining death. It’s not as easy as it might first appear! Nogrady is an Australian science journalist, and in this book she treads a fine line between expert opinion and anecdote, not letting either run away with the book to the detriment of the other. The anecdotes breathe life into the book, while the experts bring us back to earth!
Fred Watson’s Star-craving mad (2013) was described by the Sun Herald reviewer as “a lighthearted romp through the cosmos … [which] tackles the big questions about our place in the universe without ever being pompous, condescending, boring or baffling”. I haven’t read this book, but I included it because I have heard Watson, live, most recently at this weekend’s Griffyn Solo concert focussing on Urmas Sisask’s astronomy-inspired music. Watson is an astronomer who is well recognised as a communicator, winning, in 2006, the Australian Government’s Eureka Prize for Promoting Understanding of Science.
Christine Kenneally’s The invisible history of the human race (2014) was shortlisted for this year’s Stella Prize. Kenneally, a science journalist, draws on scientific research into genetics and DNA to explore who we are, where we’ve come from and where we might be going. Little questions like that. I haven’t read it, but some bloggers I respect (Resident Judge and Adventures in Biography) have, and loved it for its lucid presentation of complex ideas. I really should read it.
If you’re Australian, did you take part in any Science Week activities, like perhaps the Stargazing World Record event? And, if you’re not (or even if you are), do you have any non-fiction books about scientific matters that you’d like to recommend?
15 thoughts on “Monday musings on Australian literature: Science-based non-fiction”
My favourite is The Sleepwalkers (1959) by Arthur Koestler, a history of astronomy centred on the life and discoveries of Johannes Kepler (1571-1630). Kepler worked out that the orbits of the planets around the sun were elliptical, from which Newton deduced gravitational force.
Thanks Bill … I rather thought there’d be some great books out there about astronomy and astronomers.
I like Fred Watson’s writings on science. He makes science easier for me to understand. I loved his book Why is Uranus upside down and other Questions about the Universe. Another great read was 2011 The Best American Science and Nature Writing edited by Mary Roach. I need to have science information in short bursts for me to understand. I also did enjoy Cosmos by Carl Sagan.
Thanks Meg. That’s great to hear about Watson. One of the most fascinating science books I’ve read in the last decade was Mary Roach’s Stiff. That collection sounds really worthwhile. I agree with you about receiving my science in bursts, preferably with a spoonful of sugar!
Not quite science, but about surviving the consequences of science illiteracy… I have just finished reading Jane Rawson and James Whitemore’s Handbook: Surviving and Living with Climate Change, and I am really impressed by it. I’d say it’s essential reading for the 21st century. I just wrote my review of it today, see http://anzlitlovers.com/2015/08/25/the-handbook-surviving-and-living-with-climate-change-by-jane-rawson-and-james-whitmore/
Thanks Lisa — I think that fits into the theme. I’ll check your review.
I always thought that science and the arts are part of a continuum so I was really pleased to see these books reviewed on your website. Thankyou.
I have read quite a number of books on science (I used to be a scientist), most recently: Rosalind Franklin and DNA, by Anne Sayre. My review is on goodreads:
But the best science book I ever read is: Lise Meitner: A Life in Physics by Ruth Lewin Sime. Lise Meitner is one of the scientists who realised that the atom can be split and the breakup would liberate a huge amount of energy. The basis of nuclear power and nuclear bombs.
Parts of this book (about 100 pages of the 540) can be hard going for a non-scientist, but the rest, the story of science, scientific research, the personalities of the top scientists who worked in Germany and Europe before and during WWII, is absolutely fascinating.
Thanks Gabrielle for some books and authors I hadn’t heard of. I like the idea of the science and arts being part of a continuum, and one, perhaps that’s not totally linear (or is a continuum linear by definition?!)
Nice list! My university library has The Weather Makers. I think I will have to borrow it once I finish a book or two on my in progress pile!
Really? You’re reading enough at the moment 😀, Stefanie? You could go for a reading PB and add it in!
Sue, thank you so much for this post…and all that commented with their favorite science writing! I plan to read more non-fiction in 2020 and for my category ‘science’ I did not have very many book suggestion. I will investigate all books mentioned. If you have any more book tips for me…please share!
Excellent, Nancy. Will do… I do like science writing too.
I found Fred Watson’s Cosmic Chronicles…but I think it has just been published…so hard to find as e-book. I’ll keep looking!
Non-fiction probably gets even less overseas exposure than fiction I’d say so good luck. Let me know if anything gets really hard and I can see what I can do.