Gail Jones, Salonika burning (#BookReview)

Australian author Gail Jones’ ninth novel, Salonika burning, is a curious but beautiful novel, curious because she fictionalises four real people for whom she has no evidence that they met or knew each other, and beautiful because of her writing and the themes she explores. The novel is set during World War 1, but its focus is firmly on the interior rather than the grand stage of battle.

It opens dramatically with the burning of the city of Salonika (Thessaloniki). This is another curious thing, because this destructive event was caused not by an act of war but an accidental kitchen fire. Also, the novel is not set in Salonika but some 90 miles off, in and around “the field of tents that comprised the Scottish Women’s Hospital”, on the shores of Lake Ostrovo in Macedonia. It is 1917, and the novel’s narrative centre is this hospital and those working in and around it. Here, not Salonika, is where our four main characters are based — Stella, an assistant cook/hospital orderly; Olive, an ambulance driver; surgeon Grace; and Stanley, an orderly with the Royal Army Medical Corps. They are based on the Australians, writer Miles Franklin and adventurer Olive King, and the British painters, Grace Pailthorpe and Stanley Spencer. In her Author’s Note, Jones makes clear that she has fictionalised these characters, and that while all are known to have worked in the vicinity, there is no evidence that they met or even knew each other. It is “a novel which takes many liberties and is not intended to be read as a history”. This is fine with me. After all, a novel, by definition, is not history. The novel follows these characters over a few months after the burning of Salonika.

“everything was coming apart”

So, why Salonika? I see a few reasons. For a start, its burning sets the novel’s tone. On the first page we are presented with opposing ideas. The sight of the burning city is described as “strangely beautiful” but, on the other hand, “alarm, instant fear, the sufferings of others … were no match for excitement at a safe distance”. As the fire died, “excitement left and in its place was a murky lugging of spirit”. Throughout the novel, Salonika represents these contradictions, this tension between what is ugly, what is beautiful; between what is random, what is not; and in how to respond to, or feel about, what is being experienced.

The Salonika fire also encompasses the idea of witness and representation. In the opening scene, Jones describes a painting made of the fire by William T. Wood. It is a “morning-after scene, brightly calm, with a floaty view from the heavens” done in his “signature pastels, remote as a child’s dream and thinly decorative”. Those who saw this painting later, she writes, “saw the pretty lies of art”, whereas “former residents and soldiers said, No, it wasn’t like that”. This tension too is played out in the characters as they think about how they might represent their experience.

The burning of Salonika, then, embodies several ideas that are followed through in the novel. But, Salonika is also relevant to the plot. The novel’s narrative arc lies mainly in the characters and their emotional reactions to what is happening as the months wear on. Not only is there the war with its injured and dying soldiers, but malaria is rife, and the privations they experience, professionally and personally, are exacerbated by the burning of Salonika and the attendant shortage of essential provisions – food, petrol, medical supplies. However, a plot also unfolds, and it is something that happens on the way to Salonika, well into the story, which sets the novel’s final drama in motion.

Salonika burning traverses themes that are the stuff of the best war literature – themes that expose the “idiocy of this war, of all wars” and its impact on those caught up in it – but it offers its own take. The telling feels disjointed, particularly at the start, with its constant switching between the perspectives of the four characters who interact very little with each other until well into the novel – and even then it’s often uneasy, as befits their temperaments. And yet, the novel is compelling to read, primarily because of these characters. They are beautifully individuated, so flawed, so human, so real.

Olive, who is the first character we meet, and the one who closes the novel, is confident, tough and practical. Grace, too, is tough, doing her “duty” with a “dull vacancy”. Stella, at 38, the oldest of the four, is “cranky and wanting more”, more excitement to write about, but she believes in “chin-up and perseverance”, while the youngest, 26-year-old Stanley, is “ill-fitted … to this life of rough cynical men”.

These are “intolerable” times, and we are privy to their struggle to maintain their sanity. Olive resorts to her German grammar to escape the emotional load, while Stanley has his mules and favourite painters, his “Holy Rhymers”. Stella, “writing jolly accounts in her diary”, thinks about what stories she will tell, while Grace has her favourite brother to think about and write to. The disjointed structure mirrors, I think, their sense of isolation. Contact and the potential for friendship is there, but Matron discourages emotional engagement. There’s “no room for emotion”, she says, just “duty”. Olive, who seems to represent the novel’s moral centre, thinks otherwise:

It seemed another kind of duty, not to forget. Olive wanted to speak of what she had seen and known, though she suffered too much remembrance.

This could neatly segue to that issue of representation, and the post-war work done by Stella, Grace and Stanley, but instead, I want to conclude with another idea. On a supply trip to Salonika, Olive, “driving in her safe foreign aura”, had been indulging in a dose of self-pity, but is suddenly confronted by the loss Salonika’s burning represented for its residents, “and only now understood that it was the woe of others that claimed importance”. Likewise, Stanley, Grace and Stella are confronted with the woes of others through the novel’s closing drama, and must decide where their humanity lies.

I started this post noting some curious things about Jones’ approach to her story, but these didn’t spoil the read. Rather, they added to my interest as I read it. Ultimately, Salonika burning is a true and tenderly written novel that captures the essence of war’s inhumanity, and then goes about extracting the humanity out of it. A worthy winner of the 2023 ARA Historical Novel Prize.

Lisa and Brona also read and enjoyed this book.

Further reading

Gail Jones
Salonika Burning
Melbourne: Text Publishing, 2022
249pp.
ISBN: 9781922458834

18 thoughts on “Gail Jones, Salonika burning (#BookReview)

  1. Well, you know what I am going to say, so I might as well get it over with. How could you read this nonsense!

    Franklin and King are important parts of Australia’s war history, ignored because they are not men. And for some reason Franklin’s account of her time at Ostrovo remains unpublished.

    Jones’ account will become accepted as fictionalised fact, when I think King, who was seriously heroic, was ambulance driving further north, with the Serbian retreat.

    • Haha Bill, I’m just pleased that you decided to read my post and comment!

      You know what I’m going to say, which is that I don’t think it is nonsense. I’m not sure I fully understand why she decided to use real people, though I didn’t mind it either. I think Olive King did drive further north at one stage, but she was also based in Salonika – and drove heroically at the time of the great fire.

      But, it’s not nonsense to me because of the way Jones has explored the human experience of war from a psychological/philosophical point of view is really moving.

      • I felt like I could see this tele-novella melodrama playing out in the comments, even before I’d finished reading the review, but I still enjoying reading it. There’s merit in both positions, and I hope that nobody takes any one story as all-the-facts-they-need and that more books on this time period are published, AND I hope that everybody reads a little fiction to add to the number of versions of a story out there to provoke thought and empathy and curiosity.

        • Love it, Marcie. I’m with you, though I too understand Bill’s point. I always hope readers are able to make the distinction between fiction and history, but I worry that of course some don’t. For me, history tends to contain facts though not necessarily all the facts, while fiction contains truths but often from a particular perspective. Readers need to be aware of all this when they read, don’t they?

  2. So you two giants of reading and reviewing have each a stand: Bill’s is reality and the dread of its being lost, and ST’s is the beauty that can be found in non-reality.

    I can’t bear to read about WWI: it’s too unspeakable.

  3. I enjoyed your musings on why Salonika – I think the randomness and chaos of something like that happening in the middle of such an awful war highlights how little control we mere mortals have…except in our ability to to see beauty anywhere, experience connection and to be kind.

    I have Jones’ latest book on my TBR, but I’m not really reading a lot of fiction atm. Thankfully I have plenty of fabulous non-fiction to keep me going.

    Thanks for the link to my post – rereading it along with yours, reminds me that I did actually get a lot out of this book, and to Bill’s point perhaps, has made me more curious about Olive King in particular.

    • Thanks Brona. Yes, I agree with you about the little control we have over what happens to us but we do over how we respond to it.

      Any reason you can point to for the low fiction at the moment? I sort of understand it. I have fleeting feelings like that at times, and there’s great non-fiction around as you say.

      • I have a lot on my mind atm with the move and adjusting to our new routines – none of it has been particularly difficult, but…the days just slip away so quickly and I’m so tired by the time we get to bed each night….Holding onto a narrative or getting enough time in one sitting to get going with a book is not really happening. So I find it easier to pick up and put down non-fiction which I tend to read in bursts.

  4. George H.W. Bush came to our area in the 2000s, and the local McDonald’s caught on fire that day, so now I’m wondering if kitchen fires are trying to tell us something about war.

Leave a comment