Six degrees of separation, FROM Rodham TO …

Woo hoo, it’s spring here down under, and in my street we have yellow wattles and daffodils blooming, plus pink prunus trees and white Manchurian pears. Bright spots in difficult times, and it does the heart good. However, I’m not here to talk about that but for this months Six Degrees of Separation meme.  As always, if you don’t know this meme and how it works, please check out meme host Kate’s blog – booksaremyfavouriteandbest.

Book coverOnce again, the starting book is one I haven’t read, though unlike last month’s, I have heard of the author. The book is American author Curtis Sittenfeld’s Rodham. According to GoodReads it “imagines a deeply compelling what-might-have-been: What if Hillary Rodham hadn’t married Bill Clinton?” However, this is not where I’m going to go.

Jo Baker, LongbournI said that I have heard of Curtis Sittenfeld, and the reason is because of her involvement in The Austen Project, her contribution being Eligible, a retelling of Jane Austen’s Pride and prejudice. My first link is from this to another retelling of Pride and prejudice, Jo Baker’s Longbourn (my review).

Elizabeth Harrower, In certain circlesLongbourn was, I discovered, one of many books presented in England’s BBC4’s Books at Bedtime program. I was surprised to discover that another book broadcast on this program was our own (I mean Australia’s own) Elizabeth Harrower’s In certain circles (my review). How great is that!

And now, just to mix it up a bit, I’m going to link on circles and the fact that the circle is a symbol of infinity. This brought me to John Banville’s The infinities (my review). 

Rebecca Skloot, The immortal life of Henrietta LacksTwo main characters in The infinities can be described as infinite, meaning, in part, that they are immortal – the gods Hermes and Zeus. Gods aren’t the only things that are immortal. Cells can be too, as I learnt in Rebecca Skloot’s fascinating, heartrending, The immortal life of Henrietta Lacks (my review).

Maxine Beneba Clarke, The hate raceThe story of African-American Henrietta Lacks’ cells should be a good one. After all, her cells have gone on to produce some significant medical advances. However, the way the cells were taken and used is a story of both ingrained medical arrogance and ongoing racism whereby the human behind these cells and her family were continually ignored and discounted. A closer-to-home book about the experience of racism is Maxine Beneba Clarke’s The hate race (my review).

Book coverMaxine Beneba Clarke’s heritage is mixed, her mother being Guyanese and her father Jamaican (Caribbean). Indigenous Australian author Tony Birch, like many of us, has mixed heritage. He claims a Barbadian (Caribbean) convict amongst his ancestry! I can’t resist making that my last link, though I could also link on the fact that Birch’s writing deals with racism. His most recent novel, The white girl (my review), deals very specifically with racism in contemporary rural and urban Australia.

I’ve been very narrow in my travels this month, staying in English-speaking countries, and keeping (mostly) to the last 100 years. I’ve returned to my usual gender breakdown – two men and four women. I started with what has been described as a “what if” imaginary novel, but I ended, unfortunately, with a novel that is far too real.

Now the usual: Have you read Rodham? And, regardless, what would you link to? 

54 thoughts on “Six degrees of separation, FROM Rodham TO …

        • It’s useful to check though, isn’t it, because you can see whether you are reading as widely as you would like. I know I’m not … but checking in places like this, and at the end of the year particularly, helps keep my broad goals in my mind (even if things get in the way of achieving them!)

  1. I would be interested to learn who would have imagined HRC to be a politician if she hadn’t married one. Nobody doubts her intelligence or her legal ability; but the law and politics, however often they run together, are still very different trades.

    That said, degree one is The Collected Poems of T.S. Eliot for the line in La Figlia che Piange: “And I wonder how they should have been together!/I should have lost a gesture and a pose.”–if we can imagine two apart, we can imagine two together.

    Degree two will be Lord Byron’s Collected Poems, for he wrote to Thomas Moore February 29, 1816 of being ‘at war “with all the world and his wife;” or rather, “all the world and mywife are at war with me.’

    Degree three, John Williams’s now unavoidable Stoner, about an academic who is troubled by his–not especially believable–wife.

    Degree four will be Alison Lurie’s The War Between the Tates, adultery, divorce, and a hinted reconciliation in a college town in upstate New York. Here the academic’s scholarly life is less presented than in Stoner, but the wife is much more believable.

    Degree five will be Malcolm Bradbury’s The History Man, where at least the academic’s wife has a good time until her boyfriend gets a job in America.

    Degree six will be David Lodge’s Souls and Bodies (published in England as How Far Can You Go?) where the academic is faithful to his wife, but is left with the feeling that in a properly dramatic setting it should be the professor and not the engineer/businessman who runs off with a young woman.

    Degree seven, since we are tending back in the direction of stability, might as well be War and Peace, since it winds up with not one but two happily married couples.

    I have not read Rodham. There must be great political novels out there–I haven’t read Trollope’s ones–but most of the ones nominated for the title–All the King’s Men, for example–aren’t great. Henry and Marian Adams’s Democracy is very readable, but slight.

    • Love your opening George….and love that I know more of your links than usual, though I haven’t read your specific choices, not even Stoner.

      As for great political novels… First we’d have to define our terms? How broadly do we define politics?

      • What I think of as political novels are those set in the world of (electoral) politics. There can be something of the roman-a-clef about them: All the King’s Men has a southerner governor similar in some respects to Huey Long, and the secretary of state in Democracy looks a great deal like James Blaine. (I understand that both names have more resonance here than in the rest of the English-speaking world.) One could also regard as political novels that look at a society in crisis, e.g. Steinbeck’s Grapes of Wrath, Robert Stone’s Dog Soldiers or A Flag for Sunrise, or Heinrich Mann’s Man of Straw.

        I live in Washington, D.C., which generates a stream of novels meeting the first definition. The 20th Century archetype might be Alan Drury’s Advise and Consent, certainly a page-turner but not a literary masterpiece.

        • Thanks very much George. I’m glad you responded. I was thinking that I could define many novels the second way, more or less depending on how specific the crisis needs to be.

          Re the former, the most recent I’ve read is a political thriller, Bruny by Heather Rose. It was good though being in the thriller vein had a little more sop to genre than l’d prefer. I wonder though what you think about those novels about dictator regimes, eg Mario Vargas Llosa’s Feast of the goat.

      • Just finished reading it half an hour ago. Is a little rough in spots (sloppy editing?), but the story is quite interesting. Shares the same background as The Giver of Stars by Jojo Moyes, which I’ve also just read, and was mentioned in the comments for your blog about libraries. I enjoyed both, and Moyes is the better writer (or has a better editor), but Book Woman strikes me as being more realistic.

        • I disagree with Neil. From what I read of the Moyes book online, and after reading Troublesome Creek… I didn’t care much for the Moyes book at all… it felt… fake and flat. Plus, I’m convinced that Moyes stole from Richardson for her book.

        • Okay so… I won’t read the Moyes because I think she stole from Richardson’s book, which is VERY realistic, and the opening scene in Moyes book is almost word for word a scene in Troublesome Creek. Buzzfeed wrote it all up, showed all the passages that matched, and I am convinced Moyes is guilty. Now, when I read the excerpt from Moyes’ book, well… I didn’t find it to be at all well written. But hey, no two people read the same book, right?

        • Davida, I was aware of this controversy. I deliberately didn’t dive into any detail, since I didn’t want it to colour my reading. I refuse to read some books for all sorts of peculiar reasons. We all have our quirks. 😊

        • Haha Neil, I’m clearly out of this loop! I usually refuse to read books because I’m not interested in the topic or style… and sometimes, if I know there’s a controversy, it puts me off, whereas for some I think it does the opposite. I’m not sure why I feel that way … and it can depend on though. If it’s Helen Garner I’ll read it, controversy or not!

  2. Hi Sue, I like your links. I have not read Rodman, but I did enjoy my first pick by Sittenfield. My links are: Eligible by Curtis Sittenfeld; The Red Tent by Anita Diamant; The Dictionary of Lost Words by Pip Williams; Remarkable Creatures by Tracy Chevalier; The Silence of the Girls by Pat Barker; and Alias Grace by Margaret Atwood

  3. Clever links Sue (particularly like the middle bit with infinite/ Lacks).

    Longbourn has been on my reading list for a very long time. When the Austen Project was in full swing, I did read Sittenfeld’s P&P, and really enjoyed it. I admire her bravery as a writer (taking on P&P and Rodham!).

    • Thanks Kate … I enjoyed making that connection too! I must read Sittenfeld because she does sound like an interesting writer. My daughter may have Prep – but I’m not sure if it’s still in the house (her stuff is gradually making its way down south.)

  4. I love seeing where readers’ imaginations take them on this chain.The book I’m most interested in is The Immortal life of Henrietta Lacks.
    The wattle is blooming in my area of Melbourne, too!

  5. Great chain! I haven’t read Rodham, nor any of Curtis Sittenfeld’s books. Longbourn is one of my TBRs, I’ve read a few of John Banville’s books, but not Infinities, which I think sounds interesting and one to look out for. And I think The immortal life of Henrietta Lacks is an absolutely fascinating book – I loved it.

    • Thanks Margaret … I’m glad you liked that book. And that you have read or know many of the other authors. While it’s nice in these chains to see books and authors you’ve never heard of, I do love it when people link to ones I know!

    • Thanks Stefanie. I haven’t visited you in a while but saw a recent post in my inbox so will visit soon. I though of you when I read recently about a virtual Tour de France using Zwift. I smugly said to myself, oh, I know all about that!! Only because of you!

    • I don’t really think so Karen. My JA group had a meeting on the project a few years ago but I didn’t read any of them. This one hadn’t come out yet, and I don’t think the project has been completed. Of the three that had come out … by Alexander McCall Smith, Val McDiarmid and Trollope, only one was approved in any way by our group, and that was Trollope’s on S&S. But we don’t as a group tend to like these retellings, or sequels or prequels.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s