Skip to content

The Griffyns take us north – way north

June 4, 2015

The time has come, I think, to talk about disclosures. I have been blogging for just over six years now, mostly on literature but also, occasionally, on other cultural experiences – including the Griffyn Ensemble. The thing is that Canberra is a small place and we who move around it start to get to know each other. This is not unusual, but it does complicate the issue of reviewing/blogging. I’ve attended seminars and/or read discussions on reviewing “in a small world”. How do you be “objective” (not that we can ever be totally objective) when there’s been personal contact? And yet, how many literary reviewers in Australia do not know, have not met, the writers they review? Similarly, for music reviewers, or theatre reviewers?  Few, I’d say, once they’ve been in the game for a while and are reviewing people who’ve also been in the game for a while.

So, what does this mean? To what degree are “reviews” invalidated by such connections? To date I have disclosed when I have received books for review, but what other disclosures should be made? I’d love to know what you think. Meanwhile, I will say that Mr Gums and I identify as Griffyn Ensemble supporters. We like what they do and would love others to enjoy them too. This, I think, you need to know.

Mt Stromlo burnt out telescope

Waiting for “Southern Sky”, in the roofless, burnt out telescope, Mt Stromlo, Nov 2013

Now that’s off my chest, let’s get to the latest concert, Northern Lights. It was unusual for the Griffyns in that it comprised one piece, albeit encompassing 14 movements, composed by their musical director Michael Sollis. As Sollis explained to us at the beginning, it was his response to Estonian composer Urmas Sisask’s piano piece Southern Sky. The Griffyns had performed Sollis’ arrangement of this, with narration by astronomer Fred Watson, in the Mt Stromlo observatory ruin in 2012, reprised in 2013. That concert too comprised one multi-movement piece. To compose his “response”, Sollis visited the Arctic Circle with Fred Watson in November 2014.

Now, here’s where I want to reiterate the comment I made regarding rereading in my recent review of Peter Carey’s Amnesia. The same goes, surely, for other art forms. Consequently, when Northern Lights finished I knew I’d love to hear it again because there was a lot going on: I know I’ve missed some musical connections and relationships, and some finer points of the story being told. But, I did enjoy it. Let me set the scene …

Griffon Ensemble's Northern Lights

Part of the stage set for “Northern Lights”

The performance took place in semi-darkness in the James O. Fairfax theatre at the National Gallery of Australia. We were given a glossy program booklet which featured photographs taken by Sollis on his tour, one photograph for each movement. It was a bit of a challenge to follow the program in the semi-dark but I managed pretty well. In his introduction, Sollis told us that, while Watson’s tour focused on the northern lights, he was aware of other lights too – particularly the long twilights – and that he wanted to capture this fuller experience in his piece. The semi-dark ambience, with occasional soft changes in light levels, was intended to convey some of this. I rather liked the dark – it certainly helped keep our focus on the music and the musicians for a start!

In keeping with the Griffyn Ensemble’s style, this was more performance than pure concert. Sollis incorporated both science and myth into his work, by paralleling a scientific narration by Fred Watson (via recording) with a Snow-White-like-fairy-story-cum-norse-myth about a young girl who, cursed, is banished from the sunny sky to a dark earth where the sun can’t reach. She must find the sun to break the curse. Consequently, the culmination of Northern Lights was not “The Aurora” (Movement 12), but “Celestial Sunlight” (Movement 15*). The story takes place over 24 hours, with the times marked against the movements in the program (except for the first and last movement).

Now the music. I guess you would broadly define it as modern or contemporary classical – but, before you think it, this does not mean it was discordant or inaccessible. It wasn’t traditional by any means in form or sound, but it was evocative music, impressionistic even, if I dare invoke that term.

The ensemble, in its current line-up, has been together for around 18 months now and they look comfortable together. It’s an unusual grouping of instruments but for the audience, or me at least, it provides some exciting opportunities to hear different combinations of sounds. In Northern Lights, Sollis pushed the instruments, including Susan Ellis’ voice, to convey a range of moods and sensations. We heard whales singing, water dropping, ice creaking, particles popping; we sensed the melancholy of the long nights and the joy of the aurora.

I can’t possibly talk about all 14 movements, so I’ll just mention a few highlights which I hope I’ve remembered correctly. In “Amnesia near a  Stream” (2) played by the full ensemble, I particularly enjoyed the swelling sounds of Laura Tanata’s harp to evoke dawn or, at least, the awakening of the girl sent to earth. I also loved the harp’s gentle repetitive phrases in “Goodnight Aurora” (14), but in other movements this traditionally angelic instrument surprised us with more grating sounds. There was a lovely, melodic, singing folk-like tune, reminding me somehow of the American west, from Chris Stone’s violin in “Under Ground” (8). This piece was accompanied by some beautiful percussive effects from Holly Downes’ double bass. “Floating” (9) featured Susan Ellis, with eerie echo, and the violin. Ellis also moved us with what must surely have been challenging high humming in “Emerging Dots of White” (7). Kiri Sollis was kept busy playing piccolo, flute and alto flute (thought not all at once!) In “Excited Particles Flying High” (11) the piccolo shone as the excitement built. The sound of sheets of paper vibrating and crackling at the end of this movement was wonderfully effective. Through all this Sollis was busy conducting (with his body or eyes), attending to the mixing in of the spoken word components, or playing his guitar or mandolin.

The overriding questions are, I suppose, how well did the science work with the fairy story, and does the music hang together as a whole work. I can’t answer that on one performance, but I certainly came away feeling I’d once again experienced excellent musicians playing music that engaged both my brain and my spirit. What more can you ask, really?

Ensemble: Holly Downes (double bass), Susan Ellis (soprano), Kiri Sollis (flutes), Chris Stone (violin), Laura Tanata (harp), Michael Sollis (director/composer plus plucked strings).

* Although the last movement was no. 15, there were only 14 movements, as there was no no. 13 – a nod, presumably, to superstition and perhaps to the mystical aspects of the journey we were taken on.

12 Comments leave one →
  1. June 4, 2015 1:05 am

    Using your blog and your love and knowledge of music to support an ensemble you like is fabulous, I think! I have listened to a couple of the videos of this group that you’ve posted. I agree: they are delightful.

    • June 4, 2015 1:13 am

      Thanks Diane … I love that you say that. Makes me feel ok. (But let me say that my love of music is way greater than my knowledge.)

  2. Jim KABLE permalink
    June 4, 2015 7:34 am

    Dear WG

    There is always so much heart in your reviews! Brava! And yes, indeed, how to be “objective” when dealing with the work (literary or musical) of acquaintances, friends – or of those with whom you have a particular relationship! And – too – as you point out – that word “objective” can come in for some special analysis as well – for surely it is a virtual impossibility?

    You finished by speaking of the missing 13th movement! I loved that aside. In 1970 during my Dip.Ed. Program year at Sydney University I was concomitantly very busy in P/T jobs – saving for a Dip.Ed. Travel program at year’s end – comparative education tour – and a personal trip for a month in NZ before commencing my teaching. One of the jobs was two nights per week at the Wynyard Travelodge. There was no 13th floor. And on any of the guest floors not one room was number 13! That intrigued me – who could have possibly imagined a major company so superstitious(or so respectful of guests’ sensibilities) that in 1970 – and before – such a factor would be deemed important! In 1996 I began teaching in a Japanese university. As part of the orientation of the new first year cohort I accompanied many of them who were loaded onto a series of buses. I was allocated a bus number and a seat number. Bus No. 4 and Seat No. 13. I found buses 1, 2, 3, and 5 – but bus No. 4 – where was it? I asked my boss. She laughed. In Japan, No. 4 has the same sound as the word for death: “shi” – so in public contexts it is avoided – – she pointed out to me the 4th bus which had a “kanji” character on the destination panel – that – she said – reads “kotobuki” signifying lots of good fortune. She knew No. 13 in the western sense also carried a superstitious significance – in Australia, I said, more lottery tickets are sold on the 13th of a month – especially if tied to a Friday 13th context! As if unlucky for others – but NOT for me!

    I returned safely from that excursion. Now why are you NOT surprised. My wife and I are now in Anchorage – about to head down to Vancouver via the Inside Passage. Our cabin number is neither 4 nor 13! But for some reason it is top deck – or does that have to do with the near mishap of imminent wheel falling off some 4,800 kms ago near Golden in south-east BC. The gods are rewarding us! Am I superstitious at all? Aah! Karma!

    • June 4, 2015 9:58 am

      Haha Jim, love that discussion of 13. I’ve noticed that too at hotels. And I think some theatres don’t have a 13th row. We discovered the 4 thing in Japan when we noticed that items eg tea cups or chopsticks, say, were often sold in sets of 5 or sometimes 3 but never 4.

      Anchorage. Lucky duck. Alaska is on our bucket list. Enjoy.

  3. Meg permalink
    June 4, 2015 10:06 am

    Sounds wonderful and what a fantastic site. I love the beauty of the harp. Lucky you.

    • June 4, 2015 2:03 pm

      I think we’re lucky too Meg. I’m most anxious that they stay committed to Canberra!

  4. June 5, 2015 12:19 pm

    I do not have a musical bone in my body but still enjoy your reviews. And I concur with all the above, write with heart and honesty, all else will follow. (My birthday is the 13th and of course it is lucky, I just wish it would come up more often in Lotto!)

    • June 5, 2015 9:11 pm

      Thanks Bill … I really appreciate people’s understanding re my writing on the Griffyns. As for the 13th, I’ll keep my fingers crossed for you! Can’t hurt, eh?

  5. June 10, 2015 1:15 am

    “Mr Gums and I identify as Griffyn Ensemble supporters” I don’t think I ever would have guessed that one! 😉 Sounds like another wonderful concert. To add to the atmosphere, did the blast the air conditioning for some chill in the air too? 😀

    • June 10, 2015 9:07 am

      Haha Stefanie, thank goodness not! Some who like realism may have wished for that but I’m happy with just imagining.

  6. Susan Ellis permalink
    June 15, 2015 9:27 pm

    Thank you Whispering Gums and Mr Gum. Your reviews are truly appreciated. We learn a great deal from your valued reviews and appreciate the time you spend in reflection on each performance.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: