My reading group’s last book of the year, Holly Throsby’s third novel, Clarke, was a popular end-of-year choice. It’s a straightforward but compelling read that was inspired by a story we were all across, the Lynette Dawson story. Inspired, though, is the operative word, as Clarke is not Lynette Dawson’s story.
For a start, while Clarke’s missing woman disappears in the same decade as Lynette, the 1980s, Throsby’s story is set in a different location (a regional town not a capital city) with a different sort of husband (a physiotherapist, not a teacher). Further, there is some sort of resolution a few years, not forty years, later. This was a wise choice by Throsby. It decouples the story from Lynette Dawson, which encourages us to see it as part of a bigger story. And, setting it in a smaller environment lets Throsby explore regional town life. This latter is one of the strengths of the book.
The novel opens with fifty-something Barney being visited by the police at the house he is renting. They have a warrant to excavate the backyard as the result of their having received new information concerning the disappearance of Ginny Lawson five years previously. Clarke tracks this new police investigation through the eyes of the neighbourhood, primarily Barney, his next-door neighbour Leonie, and Dorrie and Clive across the road. Leonie, Dorrie and Clive all knew Ginny and believe her husband Lou, now living in Queensland, is implicated. They have wanted this investigation ever since Ginny disappeared, but the police at the time weren’t much interested in missing women.
The main joy in reading the novel comes from Throsby’s handling of the relationships between her characters, and the way she conveys how neighbours and communities chat or gossip about and try to second-guess situations like these. They phone each other, visit each other, talk over the fence, and discuss it with their workmates. It’s so realistic, you can hear yourself doing the same over similar scenarios.
It’s a fundamentally tough story – a disappeared wife with its hints of domestic abuse, among other griefs – but Throsby handles it with a light touch, including occasional black humour. Here, for example is Leonie talking to her workmates about some concrete in Barney’s backyard that the police are now excavating. It’s clear that it had been a topic of conversation at the time of the disappearance:
The suspicious concrete’, said Varden.
‘Yes, because that’s what you do when your wife and the mother of your child has just disappeared’, said Leonie. ‘You landscape.’
There is also some subtle wordplay. For example, Ginny’s husband Lou’s “disturbing the dirt and who knows what else” in his back yard after his wife’s disappearance mirrors the disturbance felt by the neighbours. And there are some wonderful descriptions, like Leonie’s on her tricky relationship with her mother: “Leonie remembered the warmth of her mother as a heady storm that blew in fast but never stayed long”. Or on sad Barney: “His skin was kind of grey and rough and reminded Leonie of an egg carton”.
“It would be fantastic to be able to choose one’s memories. It would make life so much more bearable.” (Barney)
There are, as I hinted above, other layers to the the narrative besides the disappeared-Ginny plot line. Barney is no longer living with his wife Deb (but why?) and Leonie has her four-year-old nephew Joe living with her (why too?). Both people, it’s clear, are dealing with some sort of grief. Throsby drip-feeds us their backstories as we get to know them, and as they get to know each other. Dorrie, across the road, provides a voice of reason for Leonie, while also engaging in the neighbourhood speculations about Ginny.
I’ll leave the narrative there, and move onto the form. Clarke is fundamentally a crime story or mystery, but it doesn’t fit those genre expectations. It’s a cold case, but the criminal investigation occurs in the background. There is no protagonist detective, and we only meet the police through their interactions with the main characters. There is, admittedly, an element of the amateur-sleuth cosy-mystery going on. Our main characters do a little of their own “amateur surveillance”, as Barney calls it, and we would, of course, like to know what happened to Ginny. But, the main focus is on what is going on for Barney and Leonie, personally, and whether they will resolve the griefs in their lives that are holding them back. It reminded me of that idea that if you scratch just beneath the surface of most people’s lives you will find a sadness or tragedy.
So, my overall assessment? I thoroughly enjoyed the read. Throsby’s language, excellent characterisation, and authentic evocation of suburban 80s-90s Australia made it a compelling read. However, the twist near the end felt a bit forced, and the ending is a bit neat, albeit there was some restraint. Generally, I prefer edgier books, books that keep me thinking about where they are going. With Clarke, I wondered about what happened to Ginny, whether we’d find out, and whether a relationship would develop between Leonie and Barney, but it didn’t, for example, delve deeply into the fundamental issues that brought about the situation in the first place. As a result, it called more on my emotions than my mind, and I do like both.
Nonetheless, Clarke is an enjoyable read – and I’d happily recommend it to readers looking for generous stories about real people grappling with life’s challenges.
Holly Throsby
Clarke
Crows Nest: Allen & Unwin, 2022
346pp.
eISBN: 9781761185540
Whispering Gums 
Ohhh! Hadn’t realised this was inspired by the Dawson (Teacher’s Pet!) story – I was TOTALLY ENGROSSED in the podcast when it came out. Will look this one up.
Yes Kate, she mentions the podcast at the end. See what you think.
I found Clarke to be an enjoyable story about relationships, but thought the twist near the end was both totally unbelievable and far too contrived, and dnf-ed.
In passing, and no doubt true to form, I was a bit unhappy that the regional centre was unnamed, and I got the feeling Throsby didn’t know a lot about country towns.
I’m guessing you didn’t review it Bill? DNF… But by then you would have read 99% of it? It was contrived I agree but coincidences do happen in real life… We don’t like them in fiction though do we?
A member of my reading group is confident that she knows exactly where it was set along the coast south of Sydney. She loved the book because the birds described in the bushwalking scenes were specific and true to that area. I liked the large regional town description. But you know my feeling about not having to be specific.
I mentioned in passing that I’d read it. Coincidences do happen but not one like that in country towns where everyone knows if not everyone, then at least knows someone who does. Because it was on an MP3 disc I couldn’t see how close to the end I was. Very close, it seems, but I just threw up my hands mid-sentence, as soon as the coincidence appeared on the horizon, and pressed eject (then hurriedly reached back down to grab the steering wheel).
Haha… Re ejecting! I don’t think it’s a that small a country town but a larger regional town. It has a mall after all, and Barney didn’t realise he’d rented THE house.
Hmmm… not sure I’d read this. As much as I like reading crime novels, I’m deliberately avoiding novels where dead or missing women are used as plot devices/ entertainment. It’s time to change the story.
I’m getting tired of replying to comments on my phone via the Jetpack app and having them disappear into the ether.
I can’t recollect exactly what I wrote kimbofo, but while I take your point, I don’t think this novel is using it as entertainment. I think there are ways of telling these stories – some are gratuitous to create a thrilling crime novel, while others are more sensitive explorations the situation. In this case it’s partly about the community’s belied that the husband did it, and frustration with the police’s inaction at the time. I probably should have made that clear. I think the story of Barney and Leonie took main stage which reduced the focus on what is a critical issue in stories about women.
I’m intrigued but would probably read Teacher’s Pet before this. I keep hearing about the Dawson case. I don’t mind a good crime book.
This isn’t Lynette Dawson’s story of course Pam, so it’s a bit about what you are interested in reading.
This sounds terrible, but I have a Facebook account with zero friends because I use the site to RSVP to Deaf events. HOWEVER, at some point I joined what is basically a “nosy neighbors” group in my area, and I have too much fun reading their arguments. Recently, one stand-out post involved a man, who, for whatever reason, keeps waking down a back alley completely naked in the middle of the night. He has been repeatedly caught on those door cam things, and the nosy neighbor group is all a-titter trying to figure out his identity. This book might just very well appeal to my nosiness 🤣
Nosy neighbours group. Love it, Melanie. Here, though, I think the neighbours were onto something serious. But I can totally relate to your nosiness! Neighbourhoods are fascinating, as I am learning in my new apartment-living environment.
I know the police say that most of their work can be done with the assistance of people paying attention in their own neighborhoods, so I can see how a “nosy” group might actually go on to solve a real crime. Actually, that sounds like the plot of a book someone needs to write!
They sort of have. I’ve read one set in a retirement village where the residents solve a crime. And I feel I’m aware of others.
I think this question of how much your mind and how much your heart are involved in a crime story is key for me too. As much as I believe the heart-story for this kind of narrative is significant, if there isn’t enough complexity to it, I’m less satisfied in the end. Particularly when the novel is situated, by marketing and publicity, as a literary (implying complexity with theme or character or setting, for me) crime novel. But I also understand that, in a certain reading mood, this kind of crime story might be just what I need and what many others enjoy as a staple in their own stacks. And I do love that egg carton comparison!
I’m not surprised, Marcie, that we are on a similar page here. I can’t think of anything to add.
The egg carton description is great isn’t it because you can easily visualise what she means.
Pingback: Sample Saturday – a suspect, water and a child | booksaremyfavouriteandbest