Skip to content

Lesley Lebkowicz, The Petrov poems (Review)

November 13, 2013

Canberra poet Lesley Lebkowicz has made a couple of brief appearances in my blog: first in my post on The invisible thread anthology, and then when she won this year’s ACT Poetry Award. I was consequently more than happy to accept for review her latest book, The Petrov poems.

English: Evdokia Petrova at Mascot Airport, Sy...

Evdokia being escorted by two Russian diplomatic couriers to a plane at Mascot Airport, Sydney (Presumed Public Domain, from NAA, via Wikipedia)

It’s intriguing that nearly 60 years after the events, we are still interested in the Petrovs. In fact, I have written about them before, in my review of Andrew Croome’s historical novel, Document Z. Most Australians will know who they are, but for those global readers here who don’t, the Petrovs were a Russian couple who worked at the Soviet Embassy in Canberra in the early 1950s. Vladimir (Volodya), Third Secretary, and his wife Evdokia (Dusya) were both Soviet intelligence officers (or, to put it baldly, spies). They defected in 1954. The defection was particularly interesting because Vladimir defected first, and Evdokia two weeks later at the airport in Darwin after some dramatic scenes at Sydney’s Mascot airport.

At first glance, The Petrov poems looks like a collection of poems but in fact it is a verse novel, albeit one comprising many short individually-titled poems. These poems are organised into four “chapters”: Part 1, Volodya defects; Part 2, Dusya defects; Part 3, The Petrovs at Palm Beach; and Part 4, The Petrovs in Melbourne.

I must admit that I wondered, initially, why Lebkowicz had decided to write about the Petrovs, given that they have already been picked over in novels, non-fiction, theatre, and television. But, as soon as I started reading it, I could see why. Lebkowicz gets into the heart of these two characters, bringing them back to ordinary human beings who were caught up in something that was both of and not of their own making. It is a rather pathetic story. There are no heroes here – and yet, as happens with these sorts of things, it captured the world’s attention for a short time.

Now, before I comment specifically on this book, I’d like to quote another Canberra poet Paul Hetherington from an interview with Nigel Featherstone in the online literary journal Verity La:

One of the ways I recognise the poetic is when I find works in which language is condensed, ramifying, polysemous and unparaphraseable. Part of what I wish to do when writing poems is to make works that speak in such ways – but to do so without resorting to any kind of trickery or artificial obscurity.

While I wouldn’t use words like “ramifying” and “polysemous”, and while we can paraphrase the ideas to a degree, this is pretty much what Lebkowicz achieves in The Petrov poems. In just 80 pages or so she manages to not only tell the story of their lives but get to the nub of their hearts and psyches – as much, anyhow, as anyone can do for another person. We learn that Volodya is not succeeding at spying:

He wants to succeed but stumbles. Failure
follows him like iron torn from a roof and
rattled along the wind.
(from “Glass I”)

We learn that he loves Dusya (“Dusya is his place in the world”), but that he loves booze, his dog and prostitutes more. He seems weak, but he’s a man struggling. With Stalin’s death and the arrest of his boss, he fears reprisals when he returns to Moscow. Here he is at the moment of defecting (which he does, after disagreements on the subject, without telling Dusya):

Once again he’s going to be wrenched from the soil.
He remembers his father – struck by lightning, buried up to his neck
by foolish men, and dying in the freezing night.
Then chaos and not enough food. Uprooting a full-grown plant
is no easy thing: so many roots
are wound through the earth. He mutters the Russian words
for sadness and home and ruffles his Alsatian’s fur.
(from “Loss”)

Dusya, on the other hand, is a stronger character, but she has suffered severe losses in her life, including her first love and her daughter:

This is something Dusya does not allow herself to think: how her
life might have been if Romàn had not been arrested. […]
If she had gone on taking happiness for granted. Living with
Romàn had been like walking along a winter street and arriving
in a field of warm poppies. If Romàn had not been broken in a
labour camp. If Irina had not died –
(from Romàn I)

While she understands Volodya’s fear, she fears even more what might happen to her family if she defects. At Darwin airport she doesn’t want to make a decision: “If only/this government man would abduct her”. But of course he can’t.

We then watch them as their relationship falters, first during ASIO’s interrogation, and then the years of living together in Melbourne, officially in disguise but known nonetheless. (“The whole street knows they are Petrovs -/too many photos, too much publicity”).

While I’m not a Petrov expert, I’ve read enough to feel that Lebokowicz’s interpretation is authentic. She explores what happens when the political interferes with the personal; she recognises the pull of culture and the despair that losing one’s home can engender; and she sees that corruption is not confined to communism:

so when ASIO falsifies (No! Not falsifies
amends, adjusts, even corrects) the documents
he brought from the Embassy – of course he assents
(from “Bones”)

Australian Women Writers ChallengeThese are wonderful, readable poems. They are poetic but, to quote Paul Hetherington’s goal, without “trickery” and “artificial obscurity”. The imagery is strong but clear. I particularly liked the way Lebkowicz varies and plays with form. None of it is rhymed, but there are sonnets, couplets, poems with multi-line stanzas but closing on a single dramatic line, and others. There are poems with short lines or terse rhythms, indicating action or stress, and poems with long lines conveying thoughts and reflections. There is also a shape-poem, “Torment”, in which the zigzag shape mirrors Dusya’s distress (“Her life is a staircase that switches directions”).

Like any good historical fiction – if a verse novel can be called that – you don’t need to know the history to understand the story told here. And like any good historical fiction writer, Lebkowicz has produced something that enables us to reconsider an historical event from another perspective and to understand the humanity below the surface of the facts. An excellent and moving read.

Lesley Lebkowicz
The Petrov poems
Sydney: Pitt Street Poetry, 2013
95pp.
ISBN: 9781922080141

(Review copy supplied by Zeitgeist Media Group)

12 Comments leave one →
  1. November 14, 2013 5:30 am

    The one from “Glass” really struck into me.

    • November 14, 2013 8:23 am

      Glass struck into you, eh? That sounds painful! Seriously, I’m glad you like it, Hannah.

  2. chillcat permalink
    November 14, 2013 5:48 am

    This sounds very moving. The collision between the personal and the political. I don’t know this story but it makes me think of E.L. Doctorow’s great novel The Book of Daniel about the persecution of the Rosenbergs, which also used striking language – sometimes I just had to sit there or be blown away!

    • November 14, 2013 8:20 am

      You know Catherine, I haven’t read any Doctorow. Must remedy that. The Petrovs were I think much smaller fish than the Rosenbergs, which is probably why they survived. Otherwise you’d think the KGB would have done something … But who really knows the ways of spies!?

  3. November 14, 2013 7:22 am

    Oh this sounds good. And a shape poem in there too! I like shape poems but hardly anyone writes them anymore.

    • November 14, 2013 8:22 am

      Yes, Stefanie … And there’s just one which gives it dramatic effect at her time of greatest mental disarray … I love the way she varied form … It made it such an interesting verse novel. Perhaps almost the poetry equivalent of connected short stories except the narrative did flow pretty directly from poem to poem.

  4. November 14, 2013 9:06 am

    I’m so glad that you reviewed this – it has reminded me that I must get myself a copy. I was lucky enough to hear Lebkowicz read from and talk about the Petrov Poems at a conference earlier this year. I recall her saying that she initially wanted to focus on Evdokia but found Vladimir too compelling a character to put aside.

    It is lovely writing and I’m looking forward to reading it in full.

    • November 14, 2013 9:44 am

      Oh that would have been great Dani. You can tell she’s more “into” Evdokia but I think she does get Vladimir as well. Such a sad story though I think Evdokia may have been happy enough at the end. It’s a gorgeous read.

  5. ian darling permalink
    November 14, 2013 9:23 pm

    A shame that verse novels are not more common – they might shaken everyone up a bit. I had not heard of this case – they seem to have been particularly vulnerable people caught up in the cold war crossfire.

    • November 14, 2013 10:40 pm

      I agree Ian … I’ve reviewed a small number on this blog now and each one I’ve enjoyed a lot. This was quite different in form but wonderful. I think it was one of those complicated things – they were and weren’t vulnerable – but in the end I think you could argue they were more vulnerable than not, and the change in the regime post-Stalin made them moreso.

Trackbacks

  1. Poetry Roundup June-Nov 2013 | Australian Women Writers Challenge
  2. Lesley Lebkowicz’s Petrov Poems | Me fail? I fly!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: