Michael Fitzgerald, Late (#BookReview)

Australian author Michael Fitzgerald’s novel Late owes something to what is known as the alternate (alternative) history genre, or what I call “what if” novels. Here, the underlying story is, what if Marilyn Monroe had not died in 1962 but, instead, had instead escaped Hollywood’s oppressive celebrity culture and moved to Sydney, Australia?

It’s hard to imagine any celebrity who has inspired more books, films, songs – you name it – than Marilyn Monroe. Just check out Wikipedia’s page listing them. There are over twenty works of literature, of which I’ve only read one, Andrew O’Hagan’s The life and opinions of Maf the dog and of his friend Marilyn Monroe (my review).

Now though, I should ‘fess up that nowhere in Fitzgerald’s book does he name Marilyn Monroe. His narrator is unnamed. However, she tells us she is also known as Zelda Zonk, a name once used by Marilyn Monroe, and the biography she gives us is that of Monroe down to her birth and death dates, the details of her marriages, and much more. So, given our narrator is intended to be Marilyn, the question is why? Why write a(nother) story using Marilyn, rather than start from scratch? And why do it using another of her personas, Zelda Zonk? I don’t know, but I’ll have a go at thinking about it.

So, let’s start with the setting. We are in 1980s Sydney, so Marilyn has been in Sydney for a couple of decades. She is living in a modernist (Harry Seidler-designed) building in Vaucluse, not far from some of the cliffs in Sydney which, in the 1980s, were also the site of gay-hate crimes known as the “Sydney cliff murders”. Notwithstanding that darkness, Sydney is beautifully evoked.

Early in the novel, our narrator meets a young man Daniel, who turns out to be gay and who is locked out of the apartment he is house-sitting. The relationship that ensues brought to mind Sigrid Nunez’s The invulnerables (my review) in which an older woman develops a friendship with a young man, but they are different books, so let’s move on. Our narrator and Daniel discover points on which they connect – from something as simple as their mothers’ names (Gladys and Gladyne) to something more fundamental like both having experienced adoption and a sense of being outsiders. Trust and tenderness develop between them, as they walk, ride on a ferry together, and cook a meal for Shabbat.

Now, a little aside: I’m not sure how to refer to the narrator because, as she writes in the opening paragraph of Scene (aka Chapter) 2, “I am not always Zelda, and Zelda is not always me”. Indeed, she writes, “Zelda is everything that I’m not […] She is the me who goes on living”, and later again, she is “the protectress of my spirit, of the shattered sense of me”. If I name her Zelda in my post, I am ignoring the distinction, and I don’t to do that. So, I am going to stick with the term “narrator”.

“What I have to say is important and personal” (Zelda)

Our narrator’s voice is variously wise, funny, erudite, and also at times self-deprecating. She is out to set the record straight in terms of her reputation as the “dumb blonde”, the “beautiful child”, the difficult actress who was always “late”:

You see, I wasn’t late: they were in a God-awful American hurry. Yes, let it be said for the record, being late wasn’t a problem: they were in this crazy rush to the moon. In any case, who aspires to be on time when, for my Art, readiness is all?

And when it really counted, let’s face it, my timing was perfect.

Drop-dead perfect.

So much in those few sentences.

She makes us see her life from a different perspective, such as the time she wore the see-through rhinestone dress to sing Happy Birthday to JFK. I don’t know what Monroe really thought or intended but that is perhaps not the point. Michael Fitzgerald gives her a voice that reflects on her experience, on how the culture manipulated her, on the hurts of being commodified and ignored as a person. Marilyn is a wonderful vehicle for interrogating celebrity, and Zelda for exploring how an escapee might see the experience and move on from it.

There are several questions to ask about this book, besides why Marilyn. Another is, why is she speaking now, a couple of decades after her arrival in Sydney? This one she answers – it’s because “the cliffs have been warning me, for months now, that evil dwells here”. And this is where Daniel as a young gay man comes in. He is the vehicle for exploring the homophobia of the time, the gay-hate crimes and cliff-murders. He is a gentle person with his own crisis, and is drawn to Zelda “like an old person or wounded animal is”. Our narrator empathises with him, and the other young men who have disappeared, and wants to help him. Their cliff-top nemesis is, pointedly, blond.

I won’t say more about the plot, because the novel’s main interest lies in the narrator’s musings. They are what I most enjoyed – her clever allusions to movies, books, poetry, and songs, her witty footnotes, her humanity, and the entertaining wordplay (starting with the multiple meanings of the title itself).

I don’t know if I understood the novel the way Fitzgerald intended, but I enjoyed the voice. It is confident, witty, in-your-face. “Without a sense of humour, we are animals, we are lost,” she says. It is also intelligent and thoughtful. This Marilyn – if I can call her that at this point – has come through and is living life the way she wants to live it, but she has heart too, and cares about the young men. It’s a surprising thing that Fitzgerald has done to put the two ideas together, but I think he has made it work. After all, why not have a gay icon care about saving young gay men?

So, I found it an absorbing to read, one that encourages us to think about who Marilyn might have been had she been allowed to be herself. And who Daniel might be if allowed to be himself!

Right near the end, our narrator comments,

Don’t you think it’s funny? How we still haven’t explored these shadows of the human heart?

Maybe we never will, fully, but books like this encourage us to keep trying.

Lisa also enjoyed and reviewed this book.

Michael Fitzgerald
Late: A novel
Melbourne: Transit Lounge, 2023
208pp.
ISBN: 9781923023024 

(Review copy courtesy Transit Lounge via publicist Scott Eathorne)

16 thoughts on “Michael Fitzgerald, Late (#BookReview)

  1. The author’s musings about an alternate Marilyn who lives on to help the maligned and oppressed in the gay community sound fascinating.

    • Thanks Carolyn… I wouldn’t say dhd lives on “to” help the oppressed gay community but that she happens to help because she has lived. If that distinction makes sense. It is a really fascinating read.

    • I agree too Cathy. I remember discussing one such book in an online reading group, probably 20 years ago. One of the members kept saying, “but it could never have happened” and I was saying “but it might’ve happened” or “this is thinking about what if it did happen” but we just couldn’t agree. I guess it’s all about suspension of disbelief. I think it’s fascinating, and perhaps instructive, to consider how things might have been different.

  2. I can’t understand why I have not heard of this clearly very interesting novel from 2023. I wonder about using the name Zelda. Where does that fit into the mix?

    Thank you for drawing attention to the novel.

    I loved Maf (not Map) the Dog.

    • Thanks Carmel. Zelda Zonk, as you probably know, was a name Marilyn (briefly?) used when she was leaving Joe DiMaggio, if I remember correctly. I wondered about writing more about her in my post. I gather Zelda is a Hebrew name meaning “blessed” and Zonk, I think, is just funny. That she used it says something about her. There’s quite a bit about Judaism in the novel too. MM converted for Arthur Miller. You know, I think to write a proper review you should – as I’m sure you do – read novels at least twice. I flicked through this one again, to saying something more about how Zelda is used in the novel but didn’t fully pin it down. I think she is intended as the confident alter-ego, the face the narrator offers to the world, while the narrator, like Daniel is the sensitive self.

      She mentions Maf in passing. (I see there’s an autocorrect typo in my post re that O’Hagan book I read – thanks for the alert, I will fix it.)

  3. To a young boy in the early 60s the names Marilyn Monroe and Jane Mansfield were fascinating – I suppose I saw them in the Sun, I certainly never saw them on screen – without us ever knowing exactly why. I think I’m happy to leave it that way.

  4. This sounds appealing to me. I also really want to read Monica Ali’s “what if” about Princess Diana (partly because it’s Ali’s, but also just the imagination required to explore the alternatives)!

    • Oh, Marcie, I’ve missed that Monica Ali. I think that would interest me, too, for the same reasons you give, though am I ready for What If about Princess Di? Does it make sense if I say a bit yes and a bit no! I’ve only read one Ali – Brick Lane, her first, and liked it.

      • That actually seems like the perfect approach for a book like this; if you were all on one side or the other, I think you’d be bound for disappointment.

        She’s not someone I’ve followed loyally either, and I missed that one, even though it’s the book that brought her onto my reading radar, but I appreciate her attention-to-detail and her curiosity, and how she explores justice and fairness in a way that highlights the contradictions (the most interesting parts, I think you agree). One of those writers who could interest me in almost anything because…of the way she scrutinises situations?

        • Yes… Love your last comment. And I have writers like that.

          And yes, we do agree on liking justice and fairness being explored in a way that highlights the contradictions. Life isn’t black and white!

  5. I was going to say it’s Marilyn likely because she is an icon in the gay community, but you noted that. The next question is why not another icon in that community, like Cher, Judy Garland, or Barbra Streisand? Well, the only conclusion I have is they all lived/live. Monroe died with so much life yet to live, so many future possibilities, that an author can imagine.

Leave a comment