Monday musings on Australian literature: Forgotten writers 4, Kate Helen Weston

In 2021, I started my Monday Musings sub-series on forgotten Australian writers, with posts on Helen Simpson and Eliza Hamilton Dunlop. This year I added Marion Simons, who was my first post on the Australian Women Writers (AWW) blog this year. As I explained then, Elizabeth Lhuede and I have decided to focus this year on sharing public domain works published in 1924 – or written by writers who died in 1924. So today, I am introducing another writer I’ve posted on there, Kate Helen Weston.

As with Marion Simons, I am not including here the piece written by Simons that I published at AWW. It is an entertaining piece titled “The ubiquitous apostrophe”. If love discussions of grammar and punctuation, do check it out at AWW.

Kate Helen Weston

Kate Helen Weston (1863-1929) was born Kate Helen Carter in Ballarat, Victoria, to British parents who came to Australia for the gold rush, but she died in Adelaide. Indeed, one “L.B.” described her in The Australian Woman’s Mirror (of 24 February 1925) as “one of the best-known of Adelaide’s feminine inky-wayfarers”. She has an entry in AustLit, and in Debra Adelaide’s Australian women writers: a bibliographic guide, but not in the Australian dictionary of biography or Wikipedia. Adelaide’s News (10 December 1924) provided a brief biography of her in their “Pen Portraits of People” series, after she was elected president of the Liberal Women’s Educational Association.

These sources aren’t quite in tune with each other. AustLit says that she married John Samuel Weston “in Adelaide in 1885, and moved there in 1892”. Adelaide’s News says she married “Mr. J.T. Weston … and later came to Adelaide”. AustLit says that she was widowed in 1894, and “turned to writing to provide financially for herself and her children. She contributed to many Australian newspapers, and published fiction between 1911 and 1928”. They also say that “she was Lady Superintendent of the Elder Conservatorium in Adelaide between 1900 and 1914”. The News, on the other hand, says that “after her husband’s death she accepted the position of secretary to the Elder Conservatorium, which she held for 22 years”. So, some minor differences in detail here – in the name of her husband and in her Elder Conservatorium role. These would be good to clarify, but for now I’m noting them and moving on.

The News tells us that she “developed literary and artistic tastes” and had published three novels in London. In fact, she published four novels, one a few years after the News’s article. Her novels were The partners (1911), The man MacDonald (1913), The prelude (1914) and The vagabond soul (1928). The man MacDonald, says News, “had a wide vogue”. Melbourne’s Table Talk (26 July 1928), announcing the publication of The vagabond soul, said that “the story, which contains a dramatic situation of some originality, is entirely Australian in setting, and it is written with the same facile spontaneity which characterises Mrs Weston’s other novels”. But, her novels have not lasted.

Both AustLit and the News mention her other literary and journalistic work, but AustLit is more specific, telling us that she contributed to many Australian newspapers. They say she was “music and art critic for The Register, contributed to The Woman’s Record – a monthly publication – and, according to her obituary in The Advertiser, she was the ‘founder of community singing in Adelaide’.” She received a Commonwealth Literary Fund Fellowship in 1915, and was also actively involved in the National Council of Women.

Weston was clearly well-known in Adelaide’s literary circles. The News (9 September 1924) reports on an address she gave at the monthly meeting of the Liberal Women’s Educational Association. (Th Association aimed to educate women in political and social matters, but, said The Register on 2 March 1926, it could also become active in social reform, “when necessary”.)

Anyhow, the focus of Weston’s talk was Australian Women Writers. The News starts with:

It was not until one began to reckon up the women writers of Australia, said Mrs. Weston, that it was realised how many there were and what a contribution they had made to the literature of Australia in poetry, prose, and journalistic work, though it was only of late years that woman had met man on equal ground in the field of journalism. 

Turning then to poetry, she said that Australian men were credited with being better poets than Australian women, but she believed that the work of women poets was “possibly much more original in style as it bore the impress of no old world stylist, and invariably expressed the writer’s personal outlook on life”. Mary Gilmore, for example, “spoke always with a woman’s voice and wrote, not of things but of humanity and the home”. She named, and apparently read from many, contemporary Australian poets.

She then talked about fiction, arguing that it’s through fiction that the life of an age is chronicled. She named many novelists including those we still recognise today, like Mary Gaunt, Ada Cambridge, Mrs Campbell (Rosa) Praed, and Ethel Turner. She also mentioned – and I think this is an astute and significant recognition – the “many letter writers, whose small contributions fitted into the interstices of the wall of literature which was being built”. 

She concluded by arguing that the Commonwealth Government needed to more actively encourage Australian literature. She pointed to the lack of Australian publishing houses and the small market. She said, writes the News, that “writers of fiction could not afford to remain in their own country, but were forced to go to the fogs of London or the bustle of America, where they lost their nationality and their English”. And she urged would-be writers “to read all styles, and copy none” – and to practise constantly. 

The News and AustLit both describe her other, considerable, community involvements and achievements. These included having a tilt at politics. The News writes that she stood for a ward in municipal elections in 1923, and “polled the highest percentage of votes ever gained by a woman in the elections in this State”. Her death, after falling from a tram from which she never regained consciousness, seems tragic.

So far I have written on four women writers for this year’s AWW project. Two, Marion Simons and Alice Tomholt, never married, and two, Kate Helen Weston and Lillian Pyke, were widowed with young children. All, it seems, managed to eke some sort of living from writing. 

12 thoughts on “Monday musings on Australian literature: Forgotten writers 4, Kate Helen Weston

  1. I know you say she wrote novels, one of them here in Australia, but it sounds as if she made her living primarily from journalism. And it made me wonder, how many of our ‘personality’ journalists will be remembered in the future? 

    BTW Did you know that Charlotte Wood’s first novel, Pieces of a Girl, is out of print and I can’t get a copy anywhere? I thought I had read every one of her novels, but I didn’t even know about that one until I linked to WP for my post about the SWF, and all my searches so far have come to nothing. I was hoping Untapped had a digital version, but no. 

    Not that CW is going to be a forgotten writer, of course!

    • Yes, my guess is she made most of her living from journalism… Though she also had that Elder Conservatorium role, now I recollect. That was probably her sustenance.

      So many books are out of print unfortunately… so often it’s the luck of the second hand shops. Good luck…

  2. I’m always surprised when I read that a woman in the early 1900s made a living from her writing. I believe L.M. Montgomery was doing the same thing because her husband had mental health issues.

    • Yes, I am too Melanie … I think we forget that women did seem to have a bit more freedom things before WW2 and we think that post-war put women back in the home is how it always was? I’m speaking off the cuff i know because it wasn’t easy for women, sexism still existed, but I feel women were a bit more active in the public sphere. Australian women writers in the 1920s and 30s were really visible, for example, but after the war they disappeared.

    • No, I hadn’t heard it either Marcie but I saw it used by someone else about different journalists so it was in vogue I think around the time. I guess it eoulfnt work now… Bytey-wayfarer (or whatever makes sense now) doesn’t have the same ring somehow!

        • No need to spoil as the technical definition relates more to the tiny bit of light on a display; we tend to think of it, first, in the context of images but, in some ways, even a single alphabet letter on the screen is an image, tho not a cute cat photo. So we can adopt it if you’re game. hee hee

        • Oh, I’m game Marcie … the purists won’t necessarily agree but we are literary people and we understand imagery after all – haha! __________________________________

          Sue Terry sue.terry@bigpond.com

          Living on Ngunnawal/Ngambri country, never ceded “Let us read, and let us dance; these two amusements will never do any harm to the world.” (Voltaire) __________________________________

          >

Leave a comment