Skip to content

Julian Davies, Call me (#BookReview)

April 14, 2019

Book coverI wasn’t sure what I was in for when I started reading Call me, the latest offering from that tricksy duo, novelist Julian Davies and illustrator Phil Day. But, it soon became clear that what was before me was a coming-of-age story. What, I wondered, was Davies doing writing such a novel? Then I remembered that this was the author who gave us, most recently, Crow mellow (my review), so I decided to relax and go with the flow. Sensible me, because this is a sophisticated take on the genre, geared to an adult audience.

The story starts in the first person voice of a young woman called Caddie, who is in bed with a young man called Pip. They are both in their last year of school, and the story spans the last couple of months of that year, through their eyes. However, the tricksiness starts here, because Caddie’s voice is first person, while Pip’s is third person subjective. Why? An author doesn’t make these decisions lightly, so I usually want to know why. It’s particularly interesting here because this is a male author choosing to write his female character in first person, and the male in third person. I’ll come back to this because right now you are probably wanting to know more about the actual story than these technicalities!

“This is Australia” (Pip’s friend, Stu)

So, the story. Caddie and Pip have been in a relationship for around a year at the start of the novel, but it’s geographically challenged because Caddie lives in the city (in Canberra, in fact) while Pip lives in the country, an hour or so’s drive away. Davies knows whereof he speaks because he too lives about an hour’s drive from Canberra. Caddie’s parents see themselves, according to Pip, as “high middle class”. They both run businesses, her father’s being an investment business called Capital Capital, and her mother’s an art gallery called Sense and Sensibility (because, as she apparently told Pip, “she was lapping up Jane Austen while her friends were still  playing with their dolls”). They keep “upgrading” their homes, and they fight a lot. Pip’s parents, on the other hand, describe themselves as “feral middle class”. Sydney escapees, they live in the not-quite-finished house they built themselves; they take a loving but laissez-faire approach to parenting; and they get on well. All this introduces the city-versus-country theme that recurs in Davies’ works, including Crow Mellow and his Meanjin piece about building his own home (my review). It’s pretty clear where Davies’ preference lies!

The majority of the novel takes place over 15 days, and chronicles, in lovely nuanced detail, the tensions that develop in Pip and Caddie’s relationship due to Pip’s decision to leave school only weeks before the end. Their thoughts and feelings are told alternately in chronologically named chapters, like “Day One” and “Day Eight (Still Later)”. Although Caddie is critical of her parents, in the way that teenagers often are, she’s following the traditional path of working hard at school and planning to go to university. She is totally into mobile phones and social media. Pip is a more independent thinker. He’s not interested in social media, and only has a phone because Caddie gave it to him. And yet, in a neat paradox, Caddie records her thoughts in a diary, while Pip records his into his phone! This is pure Davies, by which I mean nothing is simple or straightforward.

So, we have the city-versus-country theme, plus a subtle questioning of modern technology, including our reliance on it and its potential for misuse. A third theme relates to education. Pip’s decision to leave school stems from his refusal to live by external expectations that don’t feel authentic to him. He hates the “petty rules” and, as Caddie explains it, “the kind of society we live in that the education system feeds”. He has no alternative plans but feels incapable of “passively endorsing” a system he doesn’t believe in.

“What kind of person am I?” (Caddie)

Accompanying these more sociological themes are personal, psychic ones. Both Caddie and Pip are deeply concerned with their identity, specifically with what it is to be “a person”. Caddie, living in her “sheltered” house and uncomfortably aware of the material benefits provided by her parents, wonders not only “what kind of person” she is, but, more broadly, “what does it mean to be a person.” This question of personhood is frequently burdensome to her. Pip, however, has a different take, recognising that “he is only one person”. One of the challenges they face is negotiating their own and each other’s personhoods. Late in the novel, when their relationship is floundering, Pip wonders “did the new, distant Caddie undermine and diminish his sense of her as the person he thought he knew?” Meanwhile, Caddie “wonders who Pip is that he can hold this view.”

Call me, then, is essentially a book of ideas that questions, in a lightly satirical way, aspects of modern Australian society, but it’s not boringly didactic, partly because the ideas are explored though some engaging characters. These include two we met in Crow Mellow, making this book a sort of “companion piece”. The characters are the wise Phil Day, a teacher who, cheekily, happens to share a name with the book’s illustrator, and the ridiculously named cynic, Dick Scrogum (aka Scrotes). Scrogum’s opinionated banter and Day’s quiet conversations encourage Pip to dig a little deeper into the reasons for his decision.

These characters, however, are only part of why the book doesn’t become mired in earnestness. Another reason is that, surprisingly, as the book progresses, it becomes apparent that there’s more to it than just Caddie and Pip’s relationship; there is in fact quite a plot developing. Who are the mysterious callers on Pip’s phone and what do they want? Should we be worried about them? And what about the gun that Pip has? It is pretty much de rigueur that once a gun is mentioned in a narrative it’s going to be used, but will it? Is this book not what it looks, but, really, some sort of crime-mystery-thriller? You’ll need to read it to find out.

And now, I’ll return to that question I posed at the beginning about voice. Both first person and third person subjective voices offer easy engagement with characters but can only offer limited perspectives. Telling the story through two such voices widens the perspective, by letting us see Caddie and Pip through each other’s eyes as well as their own. In other words, we get a little touch of omniscience alongside close engagement. But, why is one voice first person and the other third? I’m not sure really, but maybe it’s something to do with the fact that Pip is the main protagonist, and that Caddie, as the “I”, represents both herself and the reader (who is, perhaps, likely to be more like her – female, sincere, somewhat conservative, but also open-minded and keen to explore). By being more directly in her head, we are encouraged to question, as she does, certain assumptions and values. I suspect too that there may be something autobiographical about this novel. Is Pip like Davies’ younger self? And does putting Pip at one step remove provide him with a little space to interrogate the boy he was? Certainly Caddie seems to question who Pip is more than vice versa. I’m probably wrong about this, but at least I’ve given it a shot!

As I say all too often, there is so much to say about this book. I haven’t even touched on the gorgeous landscape descriptions of a region I love. Nor on the clever segues, nor Phil Day’s whimsical illustrations, nor the humour, nor, indeed, what a beautiful book is it to look at, hold and read. However, I’ve written enough for now.

Call me, then, is not only an engrossing story about the psychic growing-up of its protagonists, but one that also offers provocative commentary on both humanity in general and modern society in particular. Them’s big boots, but Davies pulls it off, resulting in a book that’s both intelligent and fun to read.

Julian Davies
Call me
Illustrated by Phil Day
Braidwood: Finlay Lloyd Publishers, 2018
363pp
ISBN: 9780994516541

(Review copy courtesy Finlay Lloyd Publishers)

24 Comments leave one →
  1. April 14, 2019 1:11 pm

    Oops, Sue, you’ve got the wrong title for this post, it should be Call Me:)
    (Delete this after you’ve fixed it!)

    • April 14, 2019 2:08 pm

      Darn, thanks Lisa. I saw that the URL was wrong but hadn’t noticed that the actual title was too! How irritating of me! That’s what you get for copying and pasting to save a tiny bit of editing!

      • April 14, 2019 3:13 pm

        What I like about bloggng is that nobody expects perfection. We work in real time without the benefit of editors. If we mess up occasionally, they can’t complain, it’s free!

        • April 14, 2019 3:19 pm

          Thanks Lisa. Yes, exactly, but it’s awful when you want to do right by our local authors and you mess up! Copy and paste is such a two-edged sword!!

        • April 14, 2019 3:24 pm

          Are you using the WP Copy function?

        • April 14, 2019 5:13 pm

          Yes, though the function has moved in recent months. In the classic editor you used to go Add New post and there was a Copy box at the bottom where you could search for the post you wanted to copy, and select it. Is that the one you are talking about? That option disappeared a little while ago and now you have to go to All Posts, search for the one you want to copy and click Duplicate in order to copy it. I think when you do that it doesn’t change the URL whereas my recollection is that the old Copy function did update the URL. (Of course both methods did require you to change the title – duh!)

        • April 14, 2019 10:13 pm

          Yes, it has moved, yet another pointless ‘improvement’ if you ask me!

        • April 15, 2019 8:33 am

          It’s now the same as it is on hosted sites Lisa. I know from AWW and our travel blog. Less elegant it seems to me.

      • April 14, 2019 3:21 pm

        You know I just learned the copy feature and it does save time – so glad for it and so a few mistakes that unfold is worth the use of it (IMHO)

        • April 14, 2019 5:09 pm

          Yes, you just have to be careful – as you do with any copy and paste functions, eh, Prior?

        • April 14, 2019 5:10 pm

          Exactly – hah – but I was always typing favs again (or not – because it was arduous) and so very glad I tapped in… ha

        • April 14, 2019 5:15 pm

          Yes, I agree, used effectively it’s a great option. I use it a lot in another blog where I write a monthly report. I copy the previous post t become a template for the new one.

        • April 14, 2019 5:36 pm

          😉

  2. April 14, 2019 3:21 pm

    Really enjoyed this review – you had me engaged 100% and so curious now…

    • April 14, 2019 5:09 pm

      Oh Prior, that’s wonderful if I achieved that. If my post had you engaged, the book is sure to as well. Do check it out if you can.

      • April 14, 2019 5:41 pm

        I actually might just do that! But guess what? I am not a fiction reader. I prefer nonfiction and some flash fiction – but of course I watch movies and shows, which are often the result of exceptional fiction writing that led to a screenplay (and as you know – only sometimes are they really in sync sight eh actual book)
        And so besides the classics (victor hugo – dickens, etc) I never dabble into fiction – but!
        I might spread my wings here –

        • April 14, 2019 5:53 pm

          Haha Prior – I love the I’m-not-a-fiction-reader-but … followed then by the exceptions. However, I know what you mean. I’m not all sorts of reader types either (not crime, not fantasy) but there are always exceptions.

          I’ll understand if you don’t read this, but it would be nice if you did. At least my post intrigued you and that’s a big start!

        • April 14, 2019 6:40 pm

          I guess they did sound funny – I guess to me there are the classics we learn and live with – and then there are the plethora of modern fiction – and that is not what I am drawn to – (but good reviews might be shaking me) and I will be back later to check around some
          More posts – pleases to meet ya via your blog

        • April 14, 2019 7:00 pm

          And lovely to meet you too Prior.

          (Interesting what different readers are drawn to, isn’t it)

        • April 14, 2019 7:04 pm

          it sure is….

  3. April 14, 2019 5:23 pm

    I was so thrilled to see this detailed and generous account of the novel. Thank you. A marvellous thing about your blog (and some others) is that you can write a piece as long as you want it it to be, as long as it needs to be to fit the purpose. Julian’s fiction is a marvellous thing, and maybe it doesn’t always receive the attention it deserves. (I also love the drawings, and I like to colour them in.)

    • April 14, 2019 5:49 pm

      Haha, Carmel, you make me laugh just thinking about your colouring in the drawings! Thanks so much for making it through to the post after my botched initial posting and attempt to correct it!

      You are right about the freedom we bloggers have regarding length, layout etc. I still try not to go overboard with length. And I did fear this one might put people off because it looked dense without any indented quotes to break it up a bit.

      Anyhow, the thing is that I see you and Julian Davies as being a bit alike – dare I say that? – in that you are both rather cheeky in the way you play with your readers. In the way, I mean, that you play with form/voice/style/ideas/etc teasing us to play along and think a bit more about what you are doing. Do you think that’s a fair comparison?

  4. April 14, 2019 5:54 pm

    The book really sounds good, the relationship fascinating. In addition, I tend to like it when an author plays with point of views and does unusual things in that regard. The exploration of technology is interesting. I actually know some young people who, like Pip, are not keen about technology or social media.

    • April 14, 2019 6:54 pm

      Yes, I do to Brian. It might may your brain hurt a bit, but it makes reading more fun I think.

      I don’t know many young people right now as our kids are living in another city. Most seem to be into technology though I must say that not all are fully into social media.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: