Skip to content

Gabrielle Carey, Moving among strangers (#BookReview)

October 29, 2017

Gabrielle Carey, Moving among strangersEmma’s guest Monday Musings post last week on Randolph Stow provided the impetus for me to finally retrieve Gabrielle Carey’s Moving among strangers: Randolph Stow and my family from my TBR pile. I’ve been wanting to read it for the longest time, but … well, those of you with big TBRs will understand.

Moving among strangers, whose title comes from a line in Stow’s novel The girl green as elderflower, is an unusual book. It’s partly a biography of Stow, and partly a memoir of Carey and her family, but Carey wouldn’t call it either. She says in her prologue:

… this book is not a biography. Neither is it a work of literary analysis or scholarly enquiry. It is more like a ‘mostly private letter’, to use Stow’s phrase, written out of curiosity, and tenderness towards a man whom I have come to think of as an almost-relative, a dear friend of my mother’s, and the ideal literary mentor.

It all started when, as her mother was dying in 2009, Carey wrote to Stow in England letting him know of her mother’s condition. It was his response, which came four days after her mother’s death, which set Carey off. She’d known there’d been a connection, of course, but she didn’t know much about it. Stow wrote that Joan’s letters from London, when he was a schoolboy and undergraduate, “were like a window on the world”. Why, Carey wondered, did her mother correspond “with a young man, an adolescent, thirteen years her junior, who wasn’t even a relation?” This question is never properly answered in the book, not because there’s something salacious to discover (in case you were wondering), but because some connections made in life don’t have explanations beyond the fact that they occur. If that makes sense.

So, as the book progresses, Carey follows a Stow trail, “like a groupie”. She interrogates his novels and other writings, and reactions to them. She reads the letters Stow wrote to members of her and his family. And she visits the places in England where Stow had lived and meets some of the people who knew him there. One of the main strands in her story concerns Stow’s unease with Australia – with his feeling rejected by Australia and/or his rejecting Australia. There is no answer to this question either, but Carey’s exploration of the issue is enlightening (particularly given all those other Australian intellectuals who left in the 1960s – some well known like Germaine Greer and Clive James, others less so like Jill Ker Conway and Ray Mathew. Each story is different but there is probably a thread that links them too?)

There are many angles, in fact, from which I could write on this engaging but slippery book. There’s Carey’s sharing of her own history – the loss of her mother, her tricky relationship with her sister, the death by suicide of her father, and so on. There’s the form of the work and how it fits into what seems to be a new breed of biography-memoirs that is popping up. And of course, there’s Stow, himself. He comes across as an elusive character, and that’s probably because he was. When she, having made connection with him, enthusiastically tries to engage him, by correspondence, in a literary discussion about his and her mutual interest in James Joyce, he shuts her down, albeit politely, explaining that he was “old and ailing” which, in fact, he was. He died the next year.

This doesn’t deter her – for which we should be grateful because although the book is not, as she forewarns us, a biography, we do, nonetheless gain insight into Stow. She paints a picture, in the end, of a man at odds with the country in which he was born though exactly why is hard to say. Did he reject Australia – with its “depressing tolerance, even worship, of the second-rate” (his words) – or did Australia reject him with its inability to understand his work. Australian critics, apparently, panned his novel Tourmaline, for example, rejecting its combination of “fable and poetry” with “realism”. A later critic, Carey says, notes that Tourmaline represented a change, a move away from “bush realism … towards something more experimental”. However, at the time, as is so often the case with innovative creators, this was not recognised and Stow’s “too truthful, too confrontational of conventional attitudes” novel was not appreciated in his own country. Stow felt the rejection.

But, Carey is wary of coming to conclusions, as she constantly reminds us. At one point, when she has questions and no answers, she tells us that given there’s no one alive to tell her “the real story”, she “can only imagine”, but a page or two later, she says

But I could be wrong. Being wrong, I realised, is how I’ve spent most of my life: misinterpreting, misunderstanding, misjudging, miscommunication. Words slip and slide, as T.S Eliot said, or as Stow put it, ‘words can’t cope’.

A strange thing for a writer to say, perhaps? And yet, perhaps not. Perhaps, it’s something only a writer could say?

You are probably getting the gist now of this unusual book – and hopefully, realising what a delightful, engrossing and stimulating read it is. It is not a long book, and is therefore not comprehensive. If you want, for example, to read about the Stow book I know best, his first Miles Franklin winner, To the islands, you won’t find it here. What you will find though is an intelligent analysis of Stow the man and of his work. You will also gain, or, at least I did, some insights into literary Australia of the mid to late twentieth century – not a list of luminaries, or even a history, but a sense of the life and times, and of how one particular writer did (or didn’t) navigate it.

Near the end, Carey returns to a theme she introduced earlier in the book, that of twinning or duality of perspectives. She concludes that, in the Essex pub where she met people who had known Stow in the latter years of his life, she found “twin versions” of him, one “content in his lifestyle, in his aloneness, who was self-sufficient and independent” and one “who was uncomfortable in his own skin, internally and perpetually in conflict over his sexuality, his nationality and his identity.”

If you are interested in Stow, in Australian literary history more broadly, and/or in Carey herself, this is a book for you.

aww2017 badgeGabrielle Carey
Moving among strangers: Randolph Stow and my family
St Lucia: UQP, 2013
232pp.
ISBN: 9780702249921

15 Comments leave one →
  1. October 30, 2017 12:30 am

    We’re slowly bringing ‘lost’ writers back into the open. This time last year Lisa (ANZLL) had a Christina Stead week and now maintains an ongoing C.Stead page, perhaps it’s time now for a Randolph Stow week.

    • October 30, 2017 8:59 am

      Good idea, and perhaps you as the Western Australian should do it.

      • October 30, 2017 10:14 am

        I should but I might go with my ‘strength’ and do a C19th women writers week early next year.

        • October 30, 2017 10:38 am

          And if I do something it would probably be a 1920s-30s women writers BUT I’m not sure I’m up for the intensive reading I’d need to do to show the way. I just don’t get a lot of time to read in my life with all the responsibilities and commitments I have.

  2. October 30, 2017 2:53 am

    Reblogged this on World4Justice : NOW! Lobby Forum..

  3. October 30, 2017 1:29 pm

    I must get this book…I must!
    Maybe I am the one who should do a Randoph Stow week, if you both have other commitments? I have three more of his books already on the TBR…
    BTW that Christina Stead page got a lot of attention (here and internationally) during the CS Week and is still garnering a steady 15-20 hits each month, so all praise to everyone who contributed to it, both then and since.

    • October 30, 2017 2:57 pm

      I was hoping that’s what you’d say – I don’t have the readership to carry it off. Happy to read/review one or more books. (My Miss Herbert not on CS page yet (?)).

    • October 30, 2017 9:56 pm

      If you have the time, Lisa, that would be great. You could perhaps get a debate going about the relative merits of Stow versus White – but then again, competition in the arts is ugly, so let’s not go there!

      • October 30, 2017 10:14 pm

        Yikes, I think I’d want to avoid that debate too!
        BTW, Sue, do you think it would be a good idea to add the CS page to her Wikipedia page? I can’t do it myself because it’s my blog…

    • October 30, 2017 9:58 pm

      It’s a really interesting book Lisa. There’s so much I wanted to share from it but decided to just focus on an overall impression.

  4. buriedinprint permalink
    October 31, 2017 4:27 am

    I was surprised to see this was already on my TBR (ah, yes, they do get long, don’t they?) and then realised that was because of its Stella Prize nomination. Now, I just need to actually read the books on those lists, rather than simply planning to do so.

    Once, I had a year-long conversation with an Australian man, who was visiting the city I was living in, while his wife was working as a doctor in a hospital there, about Australian and Canadian literature, each of us reading the other’s recommendations and chatting about it weekly (briefly – I was working in a shop he frequented). One of the books he recommended first was by Randolph Stow – To The Islands. I thought it was quite beautiful!

    • October 31, 2017 8:41 am

      Oh, that’s wonderful Buried that you’ve read To the islands, and have Carey’s book on your pile. I know all about planning versus doing!

Trackbacks

  1. October 2017 Round-up: Classics and Literary | Australian Women Writers Challenge Blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: