This will be a short post, tonight, mainly because I couldn’t find, in the time I had available, enough information for my original idea – which was to discuss The Australian Women’s Weekly’s support for Australian writers. This was inspired by my coming across, during last week’s research into Currawong Publishing Company, an article about a prize for writers being offered by The Weekly (as it is known, familiarly) in 1941. There were two prizes, one for a short story and one for a serial. The reason it popped up during my search was because M.L.L. Woolacott of Currawong Publishing Company was one of the people quoted as supporting the prize. S/he said:
It is gratifying to see a publication such as The Australian Women’s Weekly play a leading role in the movement towards firmly establishing literature in Australia. For this is the moment to give Australian writers every opportunity.
Before I continue to the main matter of today’s post, I’d like to share what a couple of other people said. Novelist Katharine Susannah Prichard (see my review of her The pioneers) said:
Australia has many writers who would produce fine stories and novels if only they could be assured of having their works published in Australia. This competition being launched by The Australian Women’s Weekly is going to give them that chance.
And novelist Eleanor Dark (see my review of her Juvenilia), whose book The timeless land had just been selected as book-of-the-month in the USA, said that “Literature in Australia needs encouraging, for without encouragement the growth will be slow.”
So, a lot of positive support, but I had trouble tracking down an announcement of the winners, and whether the competition was run again. The information could be there, but there’s only so much time …
However, as I was researching this, I did discover that during the 1930s to 1950s, The Weekly regularly published complete novels in an issue, often in a supplement. They were, I’d say, more like novellas or very-long-form short stories, but what a great service the magazine provided to readers – and presumably to the writers whose work was published.
Now, reader, you know what I did next: I checked out these novels and writers to see if any were recognisable. I only checked a handful – there’s only so much time, you know – but I found that mostly the names were not known to me, nor to Professor Google or AustLit. Some were, though, such as T.C. Bridges whose Messenger’s millions appeared in 1935 and C.K. Thompson whose The third man (not THE third man, of course!) also appeared in 1935. The third man Supplement is headed “complete book-length novel”. A book-length novel? I wonder what other sorts of novels there are? Anyhow, Thompson was a journalist based in the Hunter Valley of New South Wales. T.C Bridges, on the other hand, was born in England and worked primarily as a freelance writer. Although he was clearly published in Australia, AustLit says that they have no evidence that he visited Australia.
This was then popular literature, perhaps even pulp fiction, but I’m impressed that during a time when people didn’t always have a lot of disposable income they could find books in their magazine. (Of course, there were also the public libraries.)
But now, I said this was going to be short, and I’m going to stick to that promise, so I’m concluding with a summary of “the story so far” for Book Two of Blanding’s Way, written by Eric Hodgins and published in 1952:
THE STORY SO FAR: In their Dream Home at Lansdale the Blandings had all sorts of exciting things happen. The vegetable garden produced a record crop, the fields caught fire, thirteen-year-old Joan became a prize-winning essayist, and Mr. Blandings was elected to the school board. NOW
I do love that the exciting things included producing a record crop, becoming a prize-winning essayist, and being elected to the School Board. Sounds right up my alley! Oh, in case you are interested, the “book” occupies 10 multi-column-tiny-font pages of the magazine. If you tried to print the “book” it would, according to my system, take 64 pages.
Note: The National Library of Australia has produced a discovery page for The Weekly, from which their digitised articles can be accessed directly. You can in fact, locate and read any issue published between establishment in 1933 and 1982. Now, if I had the time …
21 thoughts on “Monday musings on Australian literature: Books in The Australian Women’s Weekly, 1930s-1950s”
In the days when I read the WW (and that’s a very long time ago now) there used to be a short story in each week’s edition. I even submitted one of mine once, needless to say without success.
My mother had an article published in the WW in the 1960s: it was a two page spread about her time on safari in Africa. I still have it, it’s in the old size, the size of tabloid newspapers now.
Oh good for your Mum, Lisa. And good for you even submitting a story. I remember those days too, ie when those mags included short stories. Do they still? I have no idea.
I can’t think of any that still do, Sue. Such a shame. Even Melbourne’s Age newspaper stopped running its annual short story competition (a few years back now) – the summer edition was always a treat reading the winners and runners-up – often the best of Australian short story writers. I guess it’s lit journals now, though they’re not as accessible to everyone as picking up a weekly mag at the checkout!
Yes, that’s what I was thinking, Julie, just the lit journals. But, as you say, they are not as prevalent around the shops and won’t necessarily attract the more general public of readers will they.
*chuckle* I don’t know either, but if what appears to be the content of those mags these days is any indication, they wouldn’t be the sort of short stories you and I would want to read!
No probably not but it would nonetheless be good to see them supporting short stories.
Mum subscribed to Woman’s Weekly and English Women’s Weekly (it was smaller with a pink & blue cover) I don’t think there was much else to read in the 50s, except Readers Digest, and we got that too. I don’t remember country towns having libraries. The Education Dept had a circulating library which would send boxes of books for the staff room. Because we lived on the school grounds I would be first to the box, got to read lots of mild sex in my early teens.
Haha, Bill, yes, we got the Readers Digest too. I recognise your description of the English Women’s Weekly, but we didn’t get it. I lived in Mt Isa in the early to mid 1960s and it definitely had a library because as a young enthusiastic reader I haunted it. It helped that it was within walking distance of home.
Lucky you re the Education Dept box!
Also great to see the link to your review of Katharine Susannah Prichard’s The Pioneer. I’d like to read it. Especially as I’ll be staying at KSP writer’s centre for 2 weeks in July!
Oh good for you Julie. How exciting for you. I need to read more KSP. I have read a couple of others before blogging bit there’s much more to read.
Very interesting snapshot of popular reading in the middle of the 20th century. I like the idea of a magazine with a novel in it! I have a bit of an idea about finding some utterly forgotten novel from probably that period, not a reprinted classic but something long out of print and reading it cover to cover. Never quite get around to it!
I think that’s a great idea Ian, but it’s hard to get around to I agree. I have less excuse now because I have a couple such books that I retrieved from my aunt’s house. I have a plan, but …
I thought I would have a look at my shelves when I got home. In Ian’s ‘long out of print category’ and leaving aside KSP, Miles Franklin, Kylie Tennant, Frank Dalby Davidson, Vance Palmer, Ion Idriess, I also have completely forgotten works like Frederick Thwaites – White Moonlight, Rix Weaver – Beyond Cooralong, EV Timms – Shining Harvest, RS Porteous – Brigalow and more!
Oh that’s more than I have Bill, but I’m away from my shelves so can’t give you some names.
Readers were certainly given a treat with those novels in supplement form. I can’t think of many magazines that would do that today, if any
No that’s my sense too, Karen. And given the tough times, 1933 on, it must have been appreciated by many.
There are not many of the ‘popular’ magazines now that even run short stories
A shame – for readers and writers, eh?
absolutely. yet another outlet that has been replaced by on line options
True… There’s some value in that but better if it’s not replaced but supplemented by online options, isn’t it?