Skip to content

Sue Milliken, Selective memory: A life in film (Review)

March 13, 2014
Sue Milliken, Selective memory

(Courtesy: Hybrid Publishers)

Funny how things go sometimes. I may not have read Sue Milliken’s memoir, Selective memory, had the publisher, Hybrid Publishers, not noticed my rather particular interest in film via my recent review of Margaret Rose Stringer’s And then like my dreams. I’m glad they did because this book took me down memory lane …

Sue Milliken is a name well-known to me through my career as a librarian-archivist working with film and television. Her career as a film producer started in the same decade, 1970s, that my career started (albeit mine towards the end of the decade). Consequently, I enjoyed her memoir. She writes in her author’s note at the beginning that she had intermittently kept a diary, that

as the dramas around me escalated, I found myself given to recording the day’s events. They form the basis for this work.

She acknowledges that other participants “may have widely varying memories and opinions of the same events”. This is obvious, really, but probably a wise point to make when writing about an industry high in emotion and ego. Never hurts to cover yourself! And Milliken, while I suspect she has been quite circumspect in places, is rather honest in this book. She’s not afraid to let her feelings be known about certain people, such as the former wife of Barry Humphries, Diane Milstead. Diane and I, she writes, “quickly grew to loathe each other”. Admittedly, they were working on a disastrous film, Les Patterson Saves the World. How, she asks, “do you tell the funniest man in Australia that he’s not funny?” They tried, she says, and some changes were made, but “the train had left the station and we were along for the ride”. There are many such moments in the book. One that made me laugh relates to her decision to not let on to a large group of her peers that her current production, Total Recall, was going belly-up:

Anything was preferable to telling 200 industry schadenfreudeists at the conference, here are the sets but the movie has just been cancelled.

Australian director Bruce Beresford, who has made three films with Milliken, writes in the introduction that this is “a forthright and witty account”. He’s right about that.

Milliken tells her story pretty much chronologically, and focuses primarily on her work, with occasional references to her personal life. I must say that, being a typical voyeuristic reader, I’m usually interested in people’s lives, but the snippets included here sometimes felt like items from the cutting room floor. That is, they seemed to be just popped in, perhaps because that’s how they appeared in her diaries, or perhaps because they showed that she did have a life too! I enjoyed it all, but in terms of coherence, I’m not sure these little asides were necessary. What was necessary, though, was her insider’s insight into some of the most important decades in Australia’s film history.

Her main role in the industry has been as a producer; she has produced many major Australian feature films, including The Fringe-dwellersBlack Robe, Sirens, Paradise Road. However, Milliken has also worked as a film guarantor and a film censor, and held significant positions in the industry such as Chair of the Australian Film Commission, a board member of ScreenWest, and president of the Screen Producers’ Association of Australia. As you can imagine there’s a lot of politics behind these organisations, and she has many times been at the centre of them. She chronicles it all clearly but lightly, not bogging us down in excessive detail, but getting the salient points across.

But now, I’m going to go subjective, and pick out a few points in the book that have particular interest for me. The first relates to the film, The Fringe Dwellers (1987). Adapted from a novel by Nene Gare, it’s about an indigenous Australian family living on the fringe of an Australian country town. It was a moving and confronting movie, but of course it was made by white Australians from a book by a white Australian. Having recently discussed this contentious issue in a post, I was not surprised to read that there was criticism “from young Aboriginal activists who disapproved of white filmmakers telling a story about Aboriginal people, and of the story itself which was written by a white writer”. Milliken agrees that they had a point, though she also notes the positive aspects of the process – work for indigenous Australians, and increased understanding of indigenous issues for her, the cast and crew (and, hopefully, for the audiences). In 2008, Milliken was made an Officer of the Order of Australia (AO) for, among other things, support and encouragement of indigenous filmmakers. This is not to ignore the problem, but it indicates goodwill and intentions on Milliken’s part.

Another relates to Paradise Road (1997), the film of which she’s the most proud. I smiled when she discussed the casting. Its ensemble cast includes many significant actors such as Glenn Close and Frances McDormand. I happened at the time to know a good friend of the director, Bruce Beresford, and this friend and I were chuffed that Beresford (who, I believe, was also chuffed) had managed to get Jennifer Ehle for the cast. Ehle was, of course, the gorgeous Lizzie Bennet in the famous Colin Firth Pride and Prejudice (1995). It’s always bothered me that Ehle has never got the recognition she deserved for that role, all because of the fawning, which I totally understand mind you, over Firth. Anyhow, what amused me was that while my colleague and I were thrilled about Ehle, Milliken was fighting to get another, still largely unknown, actor for the film – Cate Blanchett! It was, I gather, her first feature film.

The third film I want to mention is one that hasn’t been made, The Women in Black, from the book by Madeleine St John (my review). As I’ve mentioned before, Bruce Beresford was very taken with the book and wanted to make the movie. It was Milliken he approached. She agreed that it would “make a charming film” and writes “we set about acquiring the rights”. At the completion of Paradise Road, it became the film she most wanted to do but financing “proved elusive”. It is apparently still proving to be so!

Milliken’s memory may be selective, and she may not have told every story worth telling, but this is a good read, not just for those interested in Australian film history but for anyone interested how films are made, particularly from a producer’s point of view. 

awwchallenge2014Sue Milliken
Selective memory: A life in film
Melbourne: Hybrid Publishers
267pp.
ISBN: 9781921665875

(Review copy supplied by Hybrid Publishers)

About these ads
23 Comments leave one →
  1. March 14, 2014 1:08 am

    Due to my interest in film, I’ve read a number of books written by people who have various roles in the film industry and they usually prove to be very interesting. This one sounds good. Someone needs to cough up the $$ for The Women in Black but I understand it’s becoming increasing difficult to fund film independently. Even Edward Burns has problems.

    • March 14, 2014 8:36 am

      Yes, Guy, she makes that point too about funding. I guess it’s obvious when you see ALL those companies in film titles these days. Must be such a headache for producers put using all that together. And meeting all their conditions.

  2. March 14, 2014 3:21 am

    I’m not much of a film buff but it sounds like you found yourself a good book. What an interesting story about Paradise Road. I’ve never seen it but now you make me want to. I agree with you about Ehle, it is a real shame she didn’t get nearly as much credit for P&P as Firth did especially when she carries much more acting than he does. Maybe if it was her walking out of the pond…oh I shudder to think.

    • March 14, 2014 8:43 am

      Ehle walking out of the pond, Stefanie! Now there’s an idea. LOL. Paradise Road was a good movie I think but apparently the main funders decided to premiere it in America and Americans didn’t believe it was a true story and rather panned it. I’m not sure why something has to be a true story to be good, except perhaps that not believing it was true meant they felt it was unbelievable. But as we know, truth is often stranger than fiction … And anyhow, I can’t recollect anything in it being any more unbelievable than many other true stories coming out of war. Of course, this was a true story focussing on women!

  3. March 14, 2014 4:15 am

    Yeah, she was largely Production Managing in our day, and then Producing. Back then freelance crew members knew who all the Production Managers and Producers were: we had to, in terms of hoping to get work from them. One learned rapidly not to hope in her case …

    • March 14, 2014 8:45 am

      I wondered if you knew her MR. I guess producers all have their favourites they go back to? I certainly got that sense.

      • March 14, 2014 12:30 pm

        It’s the truth. And it wasn’t necessarily a matter of their favourites’ being the best around, either – just the ones with the brownest noses. [WHO SAID THAT?!]

        • March 14, 2014 12:50 pm

          Oh dear, MR, I guess every industry has its politics and personalities. Never came across one that didn’t!

        • March 14, 2014 12:52 pm

          Indeed you are right, Sue. Of course you are. One simply remembers clearly one’s own gripes, is all. :-)

        • March 14, 2014 2:13 pm

          Understand completely MR … we surely do.

  4. March 14, 2014 4:34 am

    WOAH WAIT WHAT HOLD THE TRAIN AT THE STATION.

    You’ve started capitalising every word in titles now?

    • March 14, 2014 8:47 am

      You noticed, Hannah? Technically it seems to be always done for films .. As I recollect the Style a guide gives no other option for films but allows sentence case for books!

      • March 14, 2014 9:31 am

        Oh darn, so you’ll still be doing lowercase for books? We’ll bring you to the dark/right side eventually. ;)

        PS Of course I noticed; it’s kinda my legitimate job to notice such things on the interwebs these days. :D

        • March 14, 2014 9:47 am

          Well, good for you … and I’m not sure you will get me out of the dark side … though I do do it for collaborative blogs.

  5. March 14, 2014 6:40 am

    Remember Blanchett in Paradise Road well, Sue. In fact she’s most what I remember, and I remember too thinking at the time, Wow what an actor! Sounds like an interesting book. I like to think of those early films of people who are now big stars . There was a WA rom com in which Russell Crowe played the lead, for one. Do you know it ? It isn ‘t often mentioned as part of his filmography and he may be more than a little embarrassed about it given his macho image now but I thought it a satisfying little movie . Also Skater Dater , a short in which Nicole Kidman played the lead. Do you remember either of those?

    • March 14, 2014 9:02 am

      I agree re Cate, now, Sara, but my main recollections of Paradise Road which I enjoyed were Ehle and Close, but it was such an ensemble cast wasn’t it. I’d like to see it again. Yes I do recollect Skate Dater, but not in detail. Milliken talks about trying to cast Kidman in her early days but funders not wanting her … too unknown! I wonder whether the Crowe film you’re talking about is The crossing. Milliken talks about it’s being the debut of a megastar. He was the second lead, but she says that from the moment he walked into the farm “there was only one person to watch”. I haven’t seen it. It was released the year we moved to the USA, the year my father in law died. That time is a bit of a blur, more than usual!

      • Sara Dowse permalink
        March 14, 2014 10:19 am

        Nope, it wasn’t The Crossing, nor do I think it was one he owned up to. Think it had ‘love’ in the title. Or could have been re titled.

        Sent from my iPhone

        >

        • March 14, 2014 5:09 pm

          Aha, was it Love in Limbo, Sarah? That was 1993, after The Crossing but clearly one of his first. I searched the NFSA catalogue and then cross-checked for a description at IMDB. It was set in Kalgoorlie. I don’t know it … but then I was OS from 1990-late 1993.

        • March 14, 2014 9:30 pm

          That’s it! Love in Limbo! I’ve been trying to think of that title for yonks. So The Crossing was before that. Thanks. So much to learn.

        • March 14, 2014 9:41 pm

          Yes, I think The crossing was 1990, and Lost in Limbo 1993. And yes, so much to learn … But it keeps us busy and positive doesn’t it.

  6. March 14, 2014 9:49 am

    This is such an interesting post, WG. I have way too large a pile of books to put this one on my list, but thanks to your review, I have some fascinating snippets — not the whole thing, but it’ll do nicely. I don’t think I’ve seen Paradise Road, but I’m off to get the movie. 1997, you say, as Blanchett’s first feature film. What a quick, and deserved, rise she has had.

    • March 14, 2014 12:33 pm

      Oh thanks Robyn, I understand completely about piles. As for, Paradise Road, I’m keen to see it again now.

Trackbacks

  1. Histories and Life Writing: Reviews and news in March | Australian Women Writers Challenge

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 746 other followers

%d bloggers like this: