Skip to content

Jane Austen’s letters, 1801-1806

May 26, 2012

The  years from 1801 to 1806 were somewhat unsettled if not downright traumatic years for Jane Austen. In December 1800 her father retired and her parents decided to move themselves and their two daughters to Bath. And then in 1805 her father died, suddenly. She writes to her brother, Francis, on 21 January (Letter 40) that “I wish I could have given you better preparation-but it has been impossible”. The impact, though, was greatest on the women. It left them in a difficult and dependent financial position.

Austen writes about the above events in the letters, but there are others about which she is silent. This could be because she and her sister Cassandra, the main recipient of her letters, were together, but it could also be because Cassandra destroyed selected letters after Jane’s death in 1817. One event not in these letters is the famous proposal by Harris Bigg-Wither in 1802. Austen accepted the proposal but the next day changed her mind, and promptly left the Bigg-Wither home with Cassandra. It was a distressful situation, as the Bigg-Withers were family friends.

Something else she doesn’t talk about in this selection of letters is her writing. She didn’t write a lot during this time, and nothing, as far as we know, from the time of her father’s death until they settled in Chawton in 1809. But, she did revise Northanger Abbey (then called Susan) in 1802, selling it to a publisher in 1803, and she started her (unfinished, as it turned out) novel, The Watsons, in 1804.

So, there’s quite a bit she didn’t talk about – in the surviving letters – but there’s still plenty to interest here. These letters were written when Austen was aged 25 to 30 years old, years when she was still relatively young but old enough to have some experience of the world. As with the later letters, there’s a lot of gossip and chat about family and friends, but there are signs of the novelist she was becoming, in addition to insight into life in Georgian England.

As with my last post on her letters, I’ll use headings to structure my discussion.

Georgian England

Jane Austen wrote novels about her own era and in many ways her letters replicate in reality much of what we learn from her fiction. She describes, in these letters, modes of transport and particularly travelling arrangements for women, the boats her Naval brothers worked on, accommodation hunting in Bath, fashion, card games, balls and food. All of these we find in her novels – sometimes with barbed effect.

I particularly liked her descriptions of place. Here is Bath, soon after her arrival:

The first view of Bath in fine weather does not answer my expectations; I think I see more distinctly through rain. The sun was got behind everything, and the appearance of the place from the top of Kingsdown was all vapour, shadow, smoke, and confusion, (Letter 35)

And a little town called Appleshaw:

that village of wonderful Elasticity, which stretches itself out for the reception of everybody who does not wish for a house on Speen Hill (Letter 30)

How could someone who writes that not be a novelist!

Lyme, as Austen readers will know, is where a major scene occurs in Persuasion. What, though, do you think she thinks of the place when you read this description of

a new odd-looking man who had been eyeing me for some time, and at last, without any introduction, asked me if I meant to dance again. I think he must be Irish by his ease, and because I imagine him to belong to the hon(ble) Barnwalls, who are the son, and son’s wife of an Irish viscount, bold queer-looking people, just fit to be quality at Lyme

On her self

Not surprisingly, we learn quite a lot about Austen, directly and indirectly, through these letters. We learn much  about her likes and dislikes. She’s interested in fashion but she doesn’t like “tiny” parties with only a few people “to talk nonsense to each other”. She spanned the Age of Reason and of Romanticism, but she’s more a child of the former: she highly values “wit”, a word that appears repeatedly in her descriptions of people, often defining whether she likes them or not, and she approves rationality. “To be rational in anything”, she says, “is great praise” (Letter 43).

We also learn something about her character. She’s stoical, for example, writing about a disappointment that “there is nothing which energy will not bring one too.” (Letter 33).

Clergy

If you’ve read Jane Austen you know that she has pretty definite ideas on the clergy. She ridicules pomposity (Mr Collins in Pride and prejudice) and vanity (Mr Elton in Emma). She admires sense and responsibility (Edmund in Mansfield Park). I had to laugh, then, when I read this in her letter:

You told me some time ago that Tom Chute had had a fall from his horse, but I am waiting to know how it happened before I begin pitying him, as I cannot help suspecting it was in consequence of his taking orders; very likely as he was going to do Duty or returning from it.  (Letter 44)

How I wish I could write letters like this!

Observations of people

It is her observations of people, however, that most delight readers of her letters and show us her novelistic eye in the making. In this group of letters, for example, is a wonderful description of an older woman that doesn’t take much to remind us of Emma’s Miss Bates:

Poor Mrs** stent! it has been her lot to be always in the way; but we must be merciful, for perhaps in time we may come to be Mrs** stents ourselves, unequal to anything & unwelcome to everybody. (Letter 44)

I would not have wished our Jane to have ended up as impecunious as poor Miss Bates, but I do wish she’d lived a bit longer to give us more novels and more letters to enjoy.

Note: This is my fourth post on Austen’s letters. The first covered her letters from 1814 to 1816, the second from 1811 to 1813, and the third from 1807 to 1809.

About these ads
15 Comments leave one →
  1. May 26, 2012 2:35 pm

    These are wonderful quotes, and insightful analysis, WG. Interesting that you mentioned Jane Austen is more of the mind and reason than romanticism. I feel that too. The subject of all her novels may be love and marriage, but she approaches and handles her thematic matter quite rationally… and with wit, as you’ve mentioned. Also, another thing I find surprising is that she didn’t like Bath at all, put off by its high society of the time. But didn’t she appreciate the natural beauty of the place at all? Did you find anything about that in her letters?

    • May 26, 2012 3:36 pm

      Good question Arti … she visited Bath lots and did see its lovely side at times too. On a visit in 1799, she wrote “I like our situation very much; it is far more cheerful than Paragon, and the prospect from the drawing-room window, at which I now write, is rather picturesque, as it commands a perspective view of the left side of Brock Street, broken by three Lombardy poplars in the garden of the last house in Queen’s Parade”. I think the letter I quoted from above was from Paragon!

  2. May 26, 2012 3:39 pm

    As Arti says, great selection of quotes and I love how your thoughts and comments always make me think more about the quotes and what they reflect/show :)

    • May 26, 2012 3:59 pm

      Thanks Hannah … I reckon each reader would see different things in the letters though, wouldn’t they?

  3. May 27, 2012 8:25 pm

    Beautiful review – so looking forward to reading these one day!

    • May 27, 2012 8:42 pm

      Thanks mumma Brcky. How’s it going? You’ve got plenty of time to get to them one day, haven’t you?

  4. May 28, 2012 7:23 am

    This makes me long for the letter-writing era again! Emails are so flimsy by comparison, far too immediate and without depth.

    I do wonder why nothing was written about her writing – that would have been interesting!

    • May 28, 2012 11:49 am

      Yes, there’s something about letter writing isn’t there? I write – snail mail – to a friend in American every week. My husband wonders why we don’t email – which we do occasionally – but it’s not the same. It’s really nice having a friend who likes to write a letter. We’ve been doing it since late 1993.

      As for Austen, she did write a little about writing in her later letters – mostly when she was giving advice to a niece or two.

      • May 29, 2012 5:50 am

        Sadly, my letter-writing pal and I switched to emails several years ago…

        • May 29, 2012 8:25 am

          At least you keep in contact eh? Email has encouraged more contact I think … More thank yous too!

  5. May 28, 2012 10:05 am

    The quote about the gent’s fall from a horse and wondering if he’d taken orders is sublimely funny! John

  6. May 30, 2012 1:25 am

    Wonderful! I still write letters but none of mine seem to approach such interesting observations as Jane makes. Maybe I should start reading her letters for inspiration.

    • May 30, 2012 3:01 pm

      Give it a go, Stefanie, and tell me how you go. I keep trying to inject something witty in my letters to my snail mail friend but with little success. I keep hoping something will rub off soon!

Trackbacks

  1. Would Jane Austen Vote – Clueless? | Obscured Dreamer

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 785 other followers

%d bloggers like this: