Skip to content

Katharine Susannah Prichard, The pioneers

December 30, 2010

 

Katharine Susannah Prichard

Prichard, 1927/8, by May Moore (Courtesy: State Library of NSW, via Wikimedia Commons)

Katharine Susannah Prichard (1883-1969) is probably not as well-known in Australia, let alone internationally, as she should be. She was born in Fiji, but grew up in Tasmania and Melbourne, travelled overseas and in other parts of Australia, before settling in Western Australia in 1919. She was a founding member of the Australian Communist Party (1920) and also of the Western Australian branch of the Fellowship of Australian Writers. Politics and literature, then, were the twin passions of her life. Her most famous novel and the only one I’d read until now, Coonardoo (1929), was remarkable in its time for its exploration of the relationship between white men and black women.

I don’t usually commence a review with a biography, but it felt appropriate in this case – partly because she is so little known despite her significance and partly because her politics were an intrinsic part of her literature. In the foreword to my new edition of the book, her granddaughter describes Prichard’s values as:

a huge love of and respect for the bush; the importance of living your life with integrity; of caring and fighting for the underdog; of holding strong principles and remaining true to them; and of embracing life with passion.

These values are evident in The pioneers, her first novel which won the Hodder and Stoughton All Empire Literature Prize for Australasia in 1915. She went on to write over thirty works, including novels, plays, short stories and poetry. But, perhaps that’s enough prelude for now – on with the book.

It’s a simple tale really, plot-wise. It starts with a couple, Donald and Mary Cameron, arriving by wagon in an unsettled area of Gippsland (in eastern Victoria) in the early-mid nineteenth century. They clear the land, build a home and establish a successful farm. Very early in the story, while Donald is away getting supplies, Mary is “visited” by two desperate men, Dan Farrell and Steve. A tricky situation for a woman on her own but she manages to win them over and they leave her, unharmed. The novel tells the story of these people – and the others who move into the district – over the next two decades or so, as they work to make lives for themselves, some honestly and some not so.  There are archetypal characters here – the hard-working, tough, taciturn farmer; the loving, but wise and stoical wife; the loyal but unappreciated-by-his-father son; and more. There are escaped convicts, cattle rustlers, and a thoroughly bad man.

This may all make it sound rather typical and a bit melodramatic. And, in fact, it does have its melodrama. But the book is more than this. Its overriding style, or approach, is social realism, as Prichard explores the hopes and wishes of a new country struggling to come to terms with its origins and forge a more positive future. Her style is not particularly innovative and, while the combination of social realism and melodrama is appropriate for a novel set in the nineteenth century, the melodrama was a little discordant to my modern ears.  Take this, for example:

It was as if that encounter in the valley of shadows had brushed all misunderstandings from the love that was like the sun between them. Deirdre had wrestled with death for possession of him.

A contemporary review suggested that the romance – which drives most of the melodrama – was included primarily to attract readers who may not be interested in the history. This could very well be so.

Despite not being particularly innovative, Prichard’s writing is sure and shows that while this was her first novel she’d been honing her craft for some time. I particularly loved her language. It is gorgeously descriptive. She perfectly captures the paradox of a place that is both beautiful and harsh – and effectively conveys the physical and emotional impact of the landscape:

The bright hours were rent by the momentary screeching and chatter of parroquets, as they flew, spreading the red, green and yellow of their breasts against the blue sky. At sunset and dawn there were merry melodious flutings, long, sweet, mating-calls, carollings and bursts of husky, gnomish laughter. Yet the silence remained, hovering and swallowing insatiably every sound.

The plot, as I’ve suggested, is a little melodramatic and fairly predictable but it’s a well-told tale, nonetheless, of good forces fighting bad, of compromises that are sometimes made, and of bad judgement calls that come back to bite you. The characters, while tending to archetype, are nonetheless real so that you believe them and their various plights. There is, I think, something reminiscent of Dickens here.

The themes reflect very much the values identified by her granddaughter in the foreword. The main characters are imbued with a strong sense of principles that they try to live by. When Mary meets the convicts early in the novel, she says:

But if you will believe the truth it is this: My heart is with you and all like you.

In her twenties, Prichard apparently met the Austrian sociologist, Rudolph Broda, who introduced her to the ideas of socialism and suggested that, as a new country, Australia was leading the world in social legislation. This idea is reflected in the novel. Early on, Mary says to Donald:

It’s a new country and a new people we’re making, they said at home, and I’m realising what they meant now.

Little did she know, then, what this “making” would really involve but defining “a new country” is clearly the goal Prichard set for herself. The novel concludes by suggesting that the new generation will

be a pioneer of paths that will make the world a better, happier place for everyone to live in.

Corny? Or aspirational? Take your pick … but whichever way you see it, this novel makes a significant contribution to the development of the Australian psyche, to our transition from colonial convict-fearing past to an independent self-realised future. I am glad it has been re-released and hope that more people read it.

Katharine Susannah Prichard
The pioneers
Singapore: Monsoon Books, 2010 [first ed. 1915]
272pp.
ISBN: 9789810848804

NOTE: An ebook version of the novel is available at Project Gutenberg.

About these ads
17 Comments leave one →
  1. December 31, 2010 12:21 am

    Thank you for introducing me to this writer, as I’m ashamed to say I hadn’t known of her at all until this moment. Reading your review, I kept think of The Scarring which, although vastly different in form, seems to (perhaps) have some similar themes? Also, sociology represent! :P

    Lovely review, Whispering Gums. Thoroughly enjoyed it.

    • December 31, 2010 4:05 pm

      Thanks Hannah … interesting comment. I think The scarring is more emotive and personal that this one. But, I thought you’d like the reference to sociology!

  2. December 31, 2010 2:53 am

    She sounds like an interesting woman. I realize you have only read two of her books but do her politics eventually become more prominent in her writing or does she stick with the more melodramatic?

    • December 31, 2010 4:03 pm

      She is interesting Stefanie … I think the politics do become stronger but I’m not sure whether that overtook the storytelling as some political/ideological writers do. I certainly don’t recollect Coonardoo being overrun with politics though I read it in my younger more ideological days (not that I’m not ideological now but it’s tempered by other interests now such as literary technique and style).

      • January 1, 2011 3:32 am

        I haven’t tried Pioneers, but I read her fourth book, Working Bullocks, last year, and the politics in that one are strong without being didactic. Her sympathies were suggested rather than stated. The characters were rural working class, and so the reader was introduced to the hard lives of bullockies, the fairnesses and unfairnesses of working under a boss in a sawmill — and so on — a sort of education. And I seem to remember that her treatment of the bush (in this case, forests of karri trees) was much as it is in the passage Sue has excerpted — ecstasy at the beauty, with an awareness of the loneliness. “Yet the silence remained …”

        There was a romance, too, but the thing that struck me about that was the D.H. Lawrence duality of the romance. Ten bucks says she’d been reading Lawrence and taking in his message about primal male and female forces. Every time Boy or Girl rocked up the sentences took on that passionate Lawrentian bluntness, that loving humourless savagery.

        • January 1, 2011 9:29 am

          Thanks for this DKS. What you say here about her politics is how it is in this book … I’m rather glad to hear that she manages to maintain the sense of her belief systems rather than become more didactic.

          As for Lawrence, I did read someone else as saying that she was influenced by him but it’s been over three decades since I’ve read Lawrence so I didn’t want to tread where my interests have waned. I thank you therefore for suggesting it here. There certainly are “primal male and female forces” in this book.

  3. December 31, 2010 2:43 pm

    I don’t know what it says about the suburb I live in LOL but we have four somewhat daggy Op Shops, and treasures from long ago occasionally lurk on the bookshelves of all four, just waiting for me to scour the shelves during school holidays. That’s how I found my copy of Coonardoo, a book I only knew about because Jill Roe mentioned it in her wonderful bio of Miles Franklin. I’ll have to move it up the 2011 TBR…

    • December 31, 2010 3:53 pm

      Coonardoo is well worth reading, Lisa … though it’s been a couple of decades at least since I read it. I must read it again through my current eyes.

  4. December 31, 2010 8:43 pm

    Just like to quickly make my way here to wish you a Happy New Year before the year slips by… since you’re way ahead of me in terms of time zone. Thank you for introducing Australian writers and lit to us who are so far away. Again, all best wishes for a literary rewarding 2011!

    • December 31, 2010 11:57 pm

      You’re on the ball Arti. Thanks so much for that. And I wish you the same back. It’s been a real pleasure getting to know you this year and I look forward to more literary and cinematic interactions in 2011.

  5. residentjudge permalink
    January 2, 2011 4:56 pm

    I share your ambivalence about the book- I’m aware that it’s important, especially as a novel of its time, but uncomfortable about the melodrama.

    • January 2, 2011 9:02 pm

      Thanks RJ. I did find the melodrama a little disconcerting but, in the end, this discomfort was outweighed by the overall writing – description – which I thought was lovely. It does feel a bit like a first novel because of the melodrama – I think we should (re)read Coonardoo to see whether she got this more under control later on.

  6. Kirsty permalink
    March 18, 2012 6:32 pm

    I finally got around to reading your review of The Pioneers. Interesting to see how we both went to Trove to find contemporary reviews. I do think Prichard’s descriptions of the town and bush settings are the strengths of this book.

    • whisperinggums permalink*
      March 18, 2012 8:12 pm

      Thanks Kirsty, Trove is such a great resource. As I recollect I ended up correcting the article I quoted – do you do that when you end up at newspapers via Trove? Yes, they are the strengths, plus I think recognising the political issues of the time.

      • Kirsty permalink
        March 19, 2012 1:55 pm

        I did correct the article in Trove! I like the way you can do that little bit. And yes, the insight into how some viewed transportation and its injustices was revealing. I was intrigued to learn that convicts or former convicts were thought to be amongst the only qualified to teach school. I need to investigate this further, I’m still really curious about it.

        • March 21, 2012 3:45 am

          Every bit helps I reckon Kirsty. I love the fact that my corrections could mean another researcher may find something they otherwise may not have. Yes, that was interesting re the convicts and teaching. I’d forgotten that.

Trackbacks

  1. ‘The Pioneers’ by Kathleen Susannah Prichard | The Resident Judge of Port Phillip

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 787 other followers

%d bloggers like this: