Skip to content

Anna Krien, Into the woods

October 13, 2010

How can so many people all be looking at the same thing and see it so differently? The man moseying around in front of me looks at a 300-year old tree and sees a nursing home, while an activist twenty minutes down the road sees a block of flats for furry and feathered creatures.

Vive la différence? Or not! Anna Krien’s Into the woods is an exposé of the decades long battle in Tasmania for its forests, particularly its old-growth native forests. For those who don’t know, Tasmania is Australia’s southern island state. It is famous for its beauty and its wilderness but also, it seems, for its Vs, that is, vitriol, violence and vigilantism. You see, being a small island state, with only 500,000 people, it’s a challenge to keep its economy in the black. Sawmilling and, more recently and more controversially, woodchipping have played an important role in maintaining its economy. It is this controversy – particularly surrounding woodchips – that Krien explores in her book.

 

Anna Krien, Into the woods

Cover image (Courtesy: Black Inc)

 

On the cover is a “blurb” by Chloe Hooper who wrote The tall man about the death in custody of an indigenous man on Palm Island. This provides a clue to the book’s style, and that is that the author, like Hooper, engages personally in the situation, meeting with parties on all sides of the conflict. In Krien’s case this meant meeting ferals, environmentalists, politicians, loggers, whistleblowers, craftsmen and businessmen.

Krien has organised the book into five thematic sections:

  • Ratbags: the new generation protesters, or ferals, who live pretty primitively on/near the site  they are protecting and who are often in conflict with older activists
  • Loggers: the logging industry workers who range across a wide range of jobs in the industry and are also often conflict with each other
  • The company: Gunns Ltd, the main player in the Tasmanian logging industry, meddler (if so benign a term can be used) in politics, and initiator of the Gunns 20 lawsuit
  • Groundswell: change agents such as whistle blowers, proponents of the “rights” of nature, and shareholders wanting ethical investments
  • The mill: Gunns pulp mill saga, the beginning of the an end?

The story is a complex one, delving into competing interests within the logging industry itself – sawlogs versus woodchips, old-growth versus regrowth native forests versus plantations, public versus private forests – not to mention dissension amongst environmentalists and some very dirty politics. It is a story about jobs versus the environment and the “rights” of nature, of different value systems that set “unmanned” pristine forests against “manned” ones. It is a story of blaming and buck passing. And it is a story of half-truths and distorted truths, all in the name of defending one’s own patch. “I am on a journey through selective truths”, she writes at one point in the book.

This issue of “truths” is beautifully conveyed in her discussion of the timber industry’s language:

I find myself constantly having to decipher new words. Nature needs “disturbance”, logging is “harvesting”, deforestation is “afforestation”, burning woodchips for electricity is a form of “bio-fuel” or “renewable energy”. Woodchips are “feedstock”, while the non-commercial attributes of a forest are “non-wood values”.

The word-games though work on both sides. As she says, “evoking napalm, Hiroshima and the holocaust to describe logging is manipulative”.

A major argument presented by the logging workers is the economic one – jobs – but Krien estimates from the information given her that forestry “accounts for no more than 3% of the workforce”. In fact, she suggests that machines may be a bigger threat to timber jobs than “any greenie”. The more cynical amongst us might think that it is not so much about “jobs” but about “big business”. Sometimes, of course, big business means jobs, but that’s not always necessarily so, not if much of the work can be automated (or, sometimes, though not necessarily here, moved off-shore).

I can’t begin to convey all the information she presents in this book – the history, the statistics, the science, the criss-crossing relationships, not to mention the people, the overt and covert deals, and the truly horrifying violence (both actual and threatened). There are times when I started to feel bogged down in the complexity of it all, but I was reassured when I realised she was feeling it too. She is, in fact, like Hooper, taking us on a journey – but it is a journey that, despite her very real efforts to explore the whole story, does lean to one side, that of those who wish to protect not destroy. As she says in the last chapter:

I’ve tried to balance my seesaw heart, carefully weighing up each argument. But there is something about this island that wants you to choose sides.

I can understand that – it is, in many ways, a magical place. However, I do have one complaint about the book – my ongoing one for books of this ilk – and that is its lack of an index. It is jam-packed with people, events, places, philosophies and theories but how can the casual reader or researcher find them?

And so, is there a resolution to it all? Well no, but there is, she says, a universal story:

… in the greater scheme of things, the island is nothing but a drop in the ocean. But the story is universal – and what goes on in Tasmania goes on in the Pacific islands, in other continents, until it all comes back over the ice to Tasmania again. … Deep down in our bones we must know – we must know that nothing we do is done in isolation. Cause and effect: how did it get so noisy in between?

How indeed? Read this thoughtful, throughly researched book, and you will, unfortunately, find out.

Anna Krien
Into the woods: The battle for Tasmania’s forests
Melbourne: Black Inc, 2010
302pp.
ISBN: 9781863954877

(Review copy supplied by Black Inc)

About these ads
11 Comments leave one →
  1. October 13, 2010 6:58 am

    I so want to read this book. My undergrad degree is in environmental planning and I took a couple of subjects in forestry.

    • October 13, 2010 9:07 am

      Ah, is it? Well, you would I’m sure find it fascinating. It’s scary reading. I admire the bravery of the ferals … but wish it didn’t have to be that way, that people were more ready, as one person in the book says, “to make a steady and coherent analysis”.

      • October 13, 2010 8:23 pm

        I did my thesis on rainforests and how attitudes to them were reflected in novels, so even back then I was trying to link my two loves: books and trees! Anyway, thanks for this perceptive review. I’ve added it to the wishlist and when I am in Oz in December/January I’ll be sure to hunt it out.

  2. October 13, 2010 10:48 pm

    As Whispering Gums I totally understand that! Sounds like a fascinating topic. What novels did you do? And, do you come back here every year?

    • October 14, 2010 8:56 am

      Can’t really remember the novels — it was 20 years ago now! Joseph Conrad’s Heart of Darkness was in there somewhere.

      No, don’t come back to Oz every year — when I returned last Xmas that was the first time in almost 4 years. But because I’m taking redundancy I’ve suddenly got some time (and some cash) to go to Oz for an extended period. Am really looking forward to it!

      • October 14, 2010 9:08 am

        Ah, makes sense. Taking redundancy? Wow, so plans? Travel and then study? Freelance work? Anyhow if you make your way up to the capital do let me know.

  3. October 14, 2010 7:04 pm

    That sounds like a fascinating read. I like your references to the misuse of language, and the categorisation of various groups of stakeholders. I am sure these arguments are rehearsed all over the world in countless locations and perhaps this one is of global relevance rather than merely Tasmanian. A very useful review. Shame about the lack of an index – one of those things publishers are economising on I suspect

    • October 14, 2010 10:31 pm

      Thanks Tom. Yep, I think you are right about indexes and the economising. And, yes, too, it is a pretty usniversal story really as you say regarding the arguments, the manipulations – not to mention the usual suspects (the greenies, the politicians, the businessmen …)

  4. residentjudge permalink
    October 22, 2010 8:06 pm

    I don’t know what to make of the news this week that the loggers and environmentalists had come to some sort of rapprochement over old-growth logging. It seemed to come out of nowhere.

    • October 22, 2010 9:39 pm

      Yes, I’ve been meaning to look into it, and also wondered whether I should do a little postscript here. I did hear a while ago though that Gunns are moving out of old growth forests to focus on plantations. They have an old growth jarrah forest in WA that they are trying to sell, or thinking of selling. Anyhow, they say the activists in the Upper Florentine are packing up and going home. Hope it sticks!

Trackbacks

  1. Into the Woods, by Anna Krien, guest post by Sally Cripps. « ANZ LitLovers LitBlog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 745 other followers

%d bloggers like this: